Cited by 58Innovative Human-Technology InteractionUsability and User Interface DesignHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Human-centered AI: ensuring human control while increasing automation

Shneiderman, Ben·2022·Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext

Abstract

A new synthesis is emerging that integrates Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies with Human-Computer Interaction to produce Human-Centered AI (HCAI). Advocates of this new synthesis seek to amplify, augment, and enhance human abilities, so as to empower people, build their self-efficacy, support creativity, recognize responsibility, and promote social connections.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3538882.3542790

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 4 · Cited by 58

Authors
Shneiderman, B.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Shneiderman, Ben
Venue
Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-06-28
Pages
1-2
OpenAlex
W4282976538
Cited by
58
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7
FWCI
6.20
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext (HUMAN) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
human-centered AI, human-computer interaction, self-efficacy, creativity support, responsibility, social connectedness, empowerment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review