Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SparseEmbed: Learning Sparse Lexical Representations with Contextual Embeddings for Retrieval

Kong, Weize, Dudek, Jeffrey M., Li, Cheng, Zhang, Mingyang, Bendersky, Michael·2023·Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3539618.3592065

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 SparseEmbed architecture overview.
Figure 1 SparseEmbed architecture overview.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Sparse vector computation.
Figure 2 Sparse vector computation.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Contextual embedding computation.
Figure 3 Contextual embedding computation.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Alexandr Andoni, Piotr Indyk, and Ilya Razenshteyn. Approximate nearest neighbor search in high dimensions. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians: Rio de Janeiro 2018, pages 3287--3318. World Scientific, 2018.
  2. Yang Bai, Xiaoguang Li, Gang Wang, Chaoliang Zhang, Lifeng Shang, Jun Xu, Zhaowei Wang, Fangshan Wang, and Qun Liu. Sparterm: Learning term-based sparse representation for fast text retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.00768, 2020. · arXiv
  3. 10.1145/1390156.1390177 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1145/3397271.3401204 · DOI
  5. Thibault Formal, Carlos Lassance, Benjamin Piwowarski, and Stéphane Clinchant. Splade v2: Sparse lexical and expansion model for information retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.10086, 2021. · arXiv
  6. 10.1145/3404835.3463098 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/3477495.3531857 · DOI
  8. 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.203 · DOI
  9. 10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.241 · DOI
  10. Sebastian Hofstätter, Sophia Althammer, Michael Schröder, Mete Sertkan, and Allan Hanbury. Improving efficient neural ranking models with cross-architecture knowledge distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02666, 2020. · arXiv
  11. 10.1145/3404835.3462891 · DOI
  12. 10.1145/3511808.3557367 · DOI
  13. Carlos Lassance, Maroua Maachou, Joohee Park, and Stéphane Clinchant. A study on token pruning for colbert. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.06540, 2021. · arXiv
  14. 10.18653/v1/2021.repl4nlp-1.17 · DOI
  15. 10.1145/3404835.3463030 · DOI
  16. Biswajit Paria, Chih-Kuan Yeh, Ian EH Yen, Ning Xu, Pradeep Ravikumar, and Barnabás Póczos. Minimizing flops to learn efficient sparse representations. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.
  17. Yingqi Qu, Yuchen Ding, Jing Liu, Kai Liu, Ruiyang Ren, Wayne Xin Zhao, Daxiang Dong, Hua Wu, and Haifeng Wang. Rocketqa: An optimized training approach to dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.08191, 2020. · arXiv
  18. Keshav Santhanam, Omar Khattab, Jon Saad-Falcon, Christopher Potts, and Matei Zaharia. Colbertv2: Effective and efficient retrieval via lightweight late interaction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.01488, 2021. · arXiv
  19. Nandan Thakur, Nils Reimers, Andreas Rücklé, Abhishek Srivastava, and Iryna Gurevych. BEIR: A heterogeneous benchmark for zero-shot evaluation of in- formation retrieval models. In Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2), 2021.
  20. 10.1145/3459637.3482162 · DOI
  21. Lee Xiong, Chenyan Xiong, Ye Li, Kwok-Fung Tang, Jialin Liu, Paul Bennett, Junaid Ahmed, and Arnold Overwijk. Approximate nearest neighbor negative contrastive learning for dense text retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.00808, 2020. · arXiv
  22. 10.1145/3437963.3441667 · DOI
  23. 10.1145/3269206.3271800 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Kong, W., Dudek, J. M., Li, C., Zhang, M., & Bendersky, M.
Affiliations
Google Research, Mountain View, CA, USA
Venue
Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-07-18
Pages
2399-2403
Cited by
14
References
3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review