Platform-mediated Markets, Online Freelance Workers and Deconstructed Identities
Abstract
We advance the concept of deconstructed identity to explain how online workers' identities are being reshaped, diminished and controlled by digital labor platforms. We focus on online freelance workers and contribute to contemporary conceptualizations regarding worker's self-presentation. The empirical basis for our analysis and theorizing build from two rounds of a longitudinal panel study of online freelance workers and their interactions with online labor platforms. Findings illuminate how online freelancer's identity presentation is constrained by the structuring of their profile, the ratings and client feedback, the algorithms used by the digital platform, and platform's terms of use. Data demonstrate that workers' profiles are focused on skills, reflecting the realities of competing for work in under-regulated labor markets. Study participants report the centrality of client and platform ratings of their work, and the need to manage client feedback and ratings as a core part of their online identity presentation. These findings suggest that, far from a subjective and personal story, a freelancer's identity on a digital labor platform is better understood as a standardized depiction of skills, ratings, and metrics controlled by platform algorithms. Coupled with use policies and evolving platform designs, this platform control creates what seems to be a form of indentured servitude. We further note online freelancers both recognize this control and resist their deconstruc…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Freelancers on Upwork are constrained as they curate their online identities because of identity presentation restrictions due to platform standards, policies, and identity surveillance mechanisms.
“freelancers on Upwork are constrained as they curate their online identities, which are critical to their finding work, because of ' identity presentation restrictions due to the platform standards, policies, and identity surveillance mechanisms ' (Munoz et al., 2022, p. 11).”
From Socio‐technical issues in the platform‐mediated gig economy: A systematic literature review: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper (2024) · cites this paper as Munoz et al., 2022
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- Munoz, I., Dunn, M., Sawyer, S., & Michaels, E.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA
- Skidmore College (US)
- Syracuse University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
- Published
- 2022-11-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- CSCW2
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4309617474
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2121624)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- online labour platforms, self-presentation, platform algorithms, platform control, platform design, indentured labor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review