Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,282

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Design and Testing of a Generalized Reduced Gradient Code for Nonlinear Programming

Lasdon, L. S., Waren, A. D., Jain, A., Ratner, M.·1978·ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe a Generalized Reduced Gradient (GRG) algorithm for nonlinear programming, its implementation as a FORTRAN program for solving small to medium size problems, and some computational results. Our focus is more on the software implementation of the algorithm than on its mathematical properties. This is in line with the premise that robust, efficient, easy to use NLP software must be written and made accessible if nonlinear programming is to progress, both in theory and in practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/355769.355773

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,282

Metadata

Authors
Lasdon, L. S., Waren, A. D., Jain, A., & Ratner, M.
Venue
ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software
Published
1978-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
34-50
ISSN
  • 0098-3500 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7295
OpenAlex
W2074145107
Cited by
1,282
References
0
FWCI
9.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design and Testing of a Generalized Reduced Gradient Code for Nonlinear Programming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/355769.355773
The paper
Lasdon, L. S., Waren, A. D., Jain, A., & Ratner, M. (1978). Design and Testing of a Generalized Reduced Gradient Code for Nonlinear Programming. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software. https://doi.org/10.1145/355769.355773

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.