The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Computer Interconnection Structures: Taxonomy, Characteristics, and Examples
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a taxonomy, or naming scheme, for systems of interconnected computers.It is an attempt to provide an implementation-independent method by which to identify demgns, and a common context in which to discuss them.The taxonomy is based on interprocessor message handling and hardware interconnection topology, and distinguishes ten basic multiple-computer architectures.Various relevant attributes are identified and discussed, and examples of actual designs are given for each architecture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems
Nickerson, R. C., Varshney, U., & Muntermann, J. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.26 · Cited by 1,143
Generalized Hypercube and Hyperbus Structures for a Computer Network
Bhuyan, & Agrawal (1984) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.1984.1676437 · Cited by 855
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, G. A., & Jensen, E. D.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 1975-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 197-213
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W2085013213
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer Interconnection Structures: Taxonomy, Characteristics, and Examples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/356654.356658
- The paper
- Anderson, G. A., & Jensen, E. D. (1975). Computer Interconnection Structures: Taxonomy, Characteristics, and Examples. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/356654.356658
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
