Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The clearinghouse: a decentralized agent for locating named objects in a distributed environment

Open access
Oppen, Derek C., Dalal, Yogen K.·1983·ACM Transactions on Information Systems

Abstract

The problem of naming and locating objects in a distributed environment is considered, and the clearinghouse, a decentralized agent for supporting the naming of these "network-visible" objects, is described.The objects "known" to the clearinghouse are of many types and include workstations, file servers, print servers, mail servers, clearinghouse servers, and human user.All objects known to the clearinghouse are named using the same convention, and the clearinghouse provides information about objects in a uniform fashion, regardless of their type.The clearinghouse also supports aliases.The clearinghouse binds a name to a set of properties of various types.For instance, the name of a user may be associated with the location of his local workstation, mailbox, and nonlocation information such as password and comments.The clearinghouse is decentralized and replicated.That is, instead of one global clearinghouse server, there are many local clearinghouse servers, each storing a copy of a portion of the global database.The totality of services supplied by these clearinghouse servers is called "the clearinghouse."Decentralization and replication increase efficiency, security, and reliability.A request to the clearinghouse to bind a name to its set of properties may originate anywhere in the system and be directed to any clearinghouse server.A clearinghouse client need not be concerned with the question of which clearinghouse server actually contains the binding--the clearinghouse stub in the client in conjunction with distributed clearinghouse servers automatically fmds the mapping ff it exists.Updates to the various copies of a mapping may occur asynchronously and be interleaved with requests for bindings of names to properties; updates to the various copies are not treated as indivisible transactions.Any resulting inconsistency between the various copies is only transient: the clearinghouse automatically arbitrates between conflicting updates to restore consistency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/357436.357439

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Oppen, D. C., & Dalal, Y. K.
Venue
ACM Transactions on Information Systems
Published
1983-07
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
230-253
ISSN
  • 1046-8188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2868
OpenAlex
W2009312542
Cited by
179
References
0
FWCI
16.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The clearinghouse: a decentralized agent for locating named objects in a distributed environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/357436.357439
The paper
Oppen, D. C., & Dalal, Y. K. (1983). The clearinghouse: a decentralized agent for locating named objects in a distributed environment. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/357436.357439

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.