Cited by 29Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorTopic ModelingAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Semantic-Enhanced Differentiable Search Index Inspired by Learning Strategies

Open access
Tang, Yubao, Zhang, Ruqing, Guo, Jiafeng, Chen, Jiangui, Zhu, Zuowei, Wang, Shuaiqiang, Yin, Dawei, Cheng, Xueqi·2023·Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

Abstract

Recently, a new paradigm called Differentiable Search Index (DSI) has been proposed for document retrieval, wherein a sequence-to-sequence model is learned to directly map queries to relevant document identifiers. The key idea behind DSI is to fully parameterize traditional ''index-retrieve'' pipelines within a single neural model, by encoding all documents in the corpus into the model parameters. In essence, DSI needs to resolve two major questions: (1) how to assign an identifier to each document, and (2) how to learn the associations between a document and its identifier. In this work, we propose a Semantic-Enhanced DSI model (SE-DSI) motivated by Learning Strategies in the area of Cognitive Psychology. Our approach advances original DSI in two ways: (1) For the document identifier, we take inspiration from Elaboration Strategies in human learning. Specifically, we assign each document an Elaborative Description based on the query generation technique, which is more meaningful than a string of integers in the original DSI; and (2) For the associations between a document and its identifier, we take inspiration from Rehearsal Strategies in human learning. Specifically, we select fine-grained semantic features from a document as Rehearsal Contents to improve document memorization. Both the offline and online experiments show improved retrieval performance over prevailing baselines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3580305.3599903

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DSI and its variations train pretrained language models on the target corpus and treat the model's parameters as an index of the corpus.

    “For instance, DSI and its variations [134-137] have tried to train pretrained language models on the target corpus directly and then treat the model's parameter as a 'index' of the corpus.”

    From Foundations of GenIR (2025) · cites this paper as [136]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, Y., Zhang, R., Guo, J., Chen, J., Zhu, Z., Wang, S., Yin, D., & Cheng, X.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Computing Technology (CN)
  • Baidu (China) (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-08-04
Pages
4904-4913
OpenAlex
W4385567756
Cited by
29
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4
FWCI
7.46
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Lenovo-CAS Joint Lab Youth Scientist Project
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 62006218)
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (No. 20144310)
  • China Scholarship Council (No. 202104910234)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
document retrieval, elaboration strategies, rehearsal strategies, query generation, document identifiers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review