Cited by 19Traffic control and managementAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optimizing Mixed Autonomy Traffic Flow with Decentralized Autonomous Vehicles and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Vinitsky, Eugene, Lichtlé, Nathan, Parvate, Kanaad, Bayen, Alexandre·2023·ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems

Abstract

We study the ability of autonomous vehicles to improve the throughput of a bottleneck using a fully decentralized control scheme in a mixed autonomy setting. We consider the problem of improving the throughput of a scaled model of the San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge: a two-stage bottleneck where four lanes reduce to two and then reduce to one. Although there is extensive work examining variants of bottleneck control in a centralized setting, there is less study of the challenging multi-agent setting where the large number of interacting AVs leads to significant optimization difficulties for reinforcement learning methods. We apply multi-agent reinforcement algorithms to this problem and demonstrate that significant improvements in bottleneck throughput, from 20% at a 5% penetration rate to 33% at a 40% penetration rate, can be achieved. We compare our results to a hand-designed feedback controller and demonstrate that our results sharply outperform the feedback controller despite extensive tuning. Additionally, we demonstrate that the RL-based controllers adopt a robust strategy that works across penetration rates whereas the feedback controllers degrade immediately upon penetration rate variation. We investigate the feasibility of both action and observation decentralization and demonstrate that effective strategies are possible using purely local sensing. Finally, we open-source our code at https://github.com/eugenevinitsky/decentralized_bottlenecks .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3582576

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kumarasamy et al. [22] digital twin and decentralized learning DGMARL framework was trialled on the MLK Smart Corridor in Chattanooga and surpassed traditional systems.

    “It was trialled on the MLK Smart Corridor in Chattanooga and realized and surpassed traditional systems.”

    From Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning for Real-time Traffic Control in 6G-Enabled VANET Environments (2025) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Introduction reports that the decentralized multi-agent RL policies outperformed a feedback-control baseline, but only equaled a traffic-light baseline. The Introduction and §3.1 describe experiments on a simplified model of the San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge, not a trial on Chattanooga’s MLK Smart Corridor. Our copy does not identify the work as Kumarasamy et al.’s DGMARL digital-twin framework. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Kumarasamy et al. [22] lacks integration of real-time communication metrics and decentralized agent coordination over high-speed 6G VANET infrastructures.

    “The approach primarily focuses on physical traffic dynamics and lacks integration of real-time communication metrics and decentralized agent coordination over high-speed 6G VANET infrastructures.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Joshua Achiam Ethan Knight and Pieter Abbeel. 2019. Towards characterizing divergence in deep q-learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.08894 (2019). · arXiv
  2. Jaime Barceló and Jordi Casas. 2005. Dynamic network simulation with AIMSUN. In Simulation Approaches in Transportation Analysis. R. Kitamura and M. Kuwahara (Eds.), Springer, 57–98. · DOI
  3. Richard Bellman. 1957. A Markovian decision process. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 6, 5 (1957), 679–684.
  4. 10.1016/j.trb.2006.02.011 · DOI
  5. Mladen Čičić Li Jin and Karl Henrik Johansson. 2019. Coordinating vehicle platoons for highway bottleneck decongestion and throughput improvement. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.13049 (2019). · arXiv
  6. 10.1007/978-3-319-15024-6_7 · DOI
  7. Scott Fujimoto Herke Van Hoof and David Meger. 2018. Addressing function approximation error in actor-critic methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.09477 (2018). · arXiv
  8. Fred L. Hall and Kwaku Agyemang-Duah. 1991. Freeway capacity drop and the definition of capacity. Transportation Research Record1320 (1991), 91–98.
  9. Georgia-Roumpini Iordanidou, Claudio Roncoli, Ioannis Papamichail, and Markos Papageorgiou. 2014. Feedback-based mainstream traffic flow control for multiple bottlenecks on motorways. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 16, 2 (2014), 610–621.
  10. Stefan Krauß. 1998. Microscopic Modeling of Traffic Flow: Investigation of Collision Free Vehicle Dynamics. Ph.D. Dissertation.
  11. Eric Liang Richard Liaw Philipp Moritz Robert Nishihara Roy Fox Ken Goldberg Joseph E. Gonzalez Michael I. Jordan and Ion Stoica. 2017. RLlib: Abstractions for Distributed Reinforcement Learning. arXiv:1712.09381 [cs.AI] · arXiv
  12. Eric Liang, Richard Liaw, Robert Nishihara, Philipp Moritz, Roy Fox, Ken Goldberg, Joseph Gonzalez, Michael Jordan, and Ion Stoica. 2018. RLlib: Abstractions for distributed reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 3053–3062.
  13. Timothy P. Lillicrap Jonathan J. Hunt Alexander Pritzel Nicolas Heess Tom Erez Yuval Tassa David Silver and Daan Wierstra. 2015. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.02971 (2015). · arXiv
  14. 10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569938 · DOI
  15. Ryan Lowe, Yi I. Wu, Aviv Tamar, Jean Harb, Pieter Abbeel, and Igor Mordatch. 2017. Multi-agent actor-critic for mixed cooperative-competitive environments. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 6379–6390.
  16. 10.1109/ITSC.2010.5625107 · DOI
  17. Volodymyr Mnih Koray Kavukcuoglu David Silver Alex Graves Ioannis Antonoglou Daan Wierstra and Martin Riedmiller. 2013. Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.5602 (2013). · arXiv
  18. Markos Papageorgiou, Habib Hadj-Salem, Jean-Marc Blosseville. 1991. ALINEA: A local feedback control law for on-ramp metering. Transportation Research Record 1320, 1 (1991), 58–67.
  19. Tabish Rashid Mikayel Samvelyan Christian Schroeder De Witt Gregory Farquhar Jakob Foerster and Shimon Whiteson. 2018. QMIX: Monotonic value function factorisation for deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.11485 (2018). · arXiv
  20. Tom Schaul John Quan Ioannis Antonoglou and David Silver. 2015. Prioritized experience replay. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05952 (2015). · arXiv
  21. 10.1016/0191-2615(90)90023-R · DOI
  22. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2010)136:1(67) · DOI
  23. Cathy Wu Aboudy Kreidieh Kanaad Parvate Eugene Vinitsky and Alexandre M. Bayen. 2017. Flow: A modular learning framework for autonomy in traffic. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.05465 (2017). · arXiv
  24. Yuankai Wu Huachun Tan and Bin Ran. 2018. Differential variable speed limits control for freeway recurrent bottlenecks via deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.10952 (2018). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vinitsky, E., Lichtlé, N., Parvate, K., & Bayen, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • École nationale des ponts et chaussées (FR)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems
Published
2023-04-19
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
1-22
ISSN
  • 2378-962X (ISSN-L)
  • 2378-9638
OpenAlex
W4319737028
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CNS-1837244)
  • AWS Machine Learning Research
  • U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (CID DE-EE0008872)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Keywords
mixed-autonomy traffic, autonomous vehicles, decentralized control, multi-agent reinforcement learning, San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, penetration rate, local sensing, traffic flow optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review