Cited by 14Recommender Systems and TechniquesSpam and Phishing DetectionAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Single-User Injection for Invisible Shilling Attack against Recommender Systems

Open access
Huang, Chengzhi, Li, Hui·2023·Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

Abstract

Recommendation systems (RS) are crucial for alleviating the information overload problem. Due to its pivotal role in guiding users to make decisions, unscrupulous parties are lured to launch attacks against RS to affect the decisions of normal users and gain illegal profits. Among various types of attacks, shilling attack is one of the most subsistent and profitable attacks. In shilling attack, an adversarial party injects a number of well-designed fake user profiles into the system to mislead RS so that the attack goal can be achieved. Although existing shilling attack methods have achieved promising results, they all adopt the attack paradigm of multi-user injection, where some fake user profiles are required. This paper provides the first study of shilling attack in an extremely limited scenario: only one fake user profile is injected into the victim RS to launch shilling attacks (i.e., single-user injection). We propose a novel single-user injection method SUI-Attack for invisible shilling attack. SUI-Attack is a graph based attack method that models shilling attack as a node generation task over the user-item bipartite graph of the victim RS, and it constructs the fake user profile by generating user features and edges that link the fake user to items. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SUI-Attack can achieve promising attack results in single-user injection. In addition to its attack power, SUI-Attack increases the stealthiness of shilling attack and reduces the risk of being detected. We provide our implementation at: https://github.com/KDEGroup/SUI-Attack.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3583780.3615062

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Huang, C., & Li, H.
Affiliations
  • Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
  • Xiamen University (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-10-21
Pages
864-873
ISSN
2155-0751 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387846625
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8
FWCI
3.60
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Key R&D Program of China (2022ZD0118201)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (2020J05001)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62002303, 42171456)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
shilling attacks, recommender systems, fake accounts, user-item bipartite graph, attack stealthiness, adversarial attacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review