The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Harnessing the Disruption of New Technologies to Maintain Effective Assessment Strategies in Information Technology Education
Open accessAbstract
Technology tools have always been readily available to help students learn. From calculators to search engines to Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, it has always been a challenge for educators to maintain assessments that effectively assess student learning on their merit. Adopting a continuous improvement mindset, reflecting on student outcomes, and utilizing research in assessment development can assist in this process. This paper will make recommendations on how to develop assessments in the world of AI that will promote and effectively assess student learning in Information Technology education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These tools allow students to automatically gen -erate essays, reports, and coding solutions, increasing the risk of plagiarism and contract cheating [ 55, 56, 79-81].”
From Redefining student assessment in AI-infused learning environments: a systematic review of challenges and strategies for academic integrity (2026) · cites this paper as [55]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perkins, M. (2023) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.02.07 · Cited by 839
The Impact of Assessment on Student Learning
Rust, C. (2002) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787402003002004 · Cited by 484
Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence
Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075 · Cited by 409
A Framework for the Discipline of Information Technology
Said, H., Zidar, M., Varlioglu, S., et al. (2021) · Conference on Information Technology Education · doi:10.1145/3450329.3478313 · Cited by 13
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- A. Waters . 2015 . A Brief History of Calculators in the Classroom . Hack Education. Retrieved May 29, 2023 from http://hackeducation.com/2015/03/12/calculators A. Waters. 2015. A Brief History of Calculators in the Classroom. Hack Education. Retrieved May 29, 2023 from http://hackeducation.com/2015/03/12/calculators
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ncube, P. D. N., Dzvapatsva, G. P., Matobobo, C., & Ranga, M. M. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00871-w · Cited by 31
“These tools allow students to automatically gen - erate essays, reports, and coding solutions, increasing the risk of plagiarism and contract cheating [ 55, 56, 79–81].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Soale, J., & Collins, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Venue
- The 24th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2023-10-11
- Pages
- 176-177
- OpenAlex
- W4387469160
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Conference on Information Technology Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Keywords
- assessment design, information technology education, artificial intelligence in education, AI tools, student learning assessment, continuous improvement, student outcomes, assessment development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
