SIGMA-DF: Single-Side Guided Meta-Learning for Deepfake Detection
Open accessAbstract
The current challenge of Deepfake detection is the cross-domain performance on unseen Deepfake data. Instead of extracting forgery artifacts that are robust to the cross-domain scenarios as most previous works, we propose a novel method named Single-sIde Guided Meta-leArning framework for DeepFake detection (SIGMA-DF) which simulates the cross-domain scenarios during training by synthesizing virtual testing domain through meta-learning. In addition, SIGMA-DF integrates the meta-learning algorithm with a new ensemble meta-learning framework, which separately trains multiple meta-learners in the meta-train phase to aggregate multiple domain shifts in each iteration. Hence multiple cross-domain scenarios are simulated, better leveraging the domain knowledge. In addition, considering the contribution of hard samples in single-side distribution optimization, a novel weighted single-side loss function is proposed to only narrow the intra-class distance between real faces and enlarge the inter-class distance for both real and fake faces in embedding space with the awareness of sample weights. Extensive experiments are conducted on several standard Deepfake detection datasets to demonstrate that the proposed SIGMA-DF achieves state-of-the-art performance. In particular, in the cross-domain evaluation from FF++ to Celeb-DF and DFDC, our SIGMA-DF outperforms the baselines by 4.4% and 4.5% in terms of AUC, respectively.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Commonly used techniques for adaptive learning include meta-learning, incremental learning, knowledge distillation, and domain generalization.
“Common used techniques include meta-learning [20, 182-184], incremental learning [185], knowledge distillation [186], and domain generalization [187].”
From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [183]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 4
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Darius Afchar, Vincent Nozick, Junichi Yamagishi, and Isao Echizen. 2018. Mesonet: a compact facial video forgery detection network. In 2018 IEEE in- ternational workshop on information forensics and security (WIFS). IEEE, 1-7.
- Yogesh Balaji, Swami Sankaranarayanan, and Rama Chellappa. 2018. Metareg: Towards domain generalization using meta-regularization. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018).
- Gilles Blanchard, Gyemin Lee, and Clayton Scott. 2011. Generalizing from sev- eral related classification tasks to a new unlabeled sample. Advances in neural information processing systems 24 (2011).
- Fabio M Carlucci, Antonio D'Innocente, Silvia Bucci, Barbara Caputo, and Tatiana Tommasi. 2019. Domain generalization by solving jigsaw puzzles. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2229- 2238.
- Liang Chen, Yong Zhang, Yibing Song, Jue Wang, and Lingqiao Liu. 2022. OST: Improving generalization of deepfake detection via one-shot test-time training. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
- Shen Chen, Taiping Yao, Yang Chen, Shouhong Ding, Jilin Li, and Rongrong Ji. 2021. Local relation learning for face forgery detection. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35. 1081-1088.
- François Chollet. 2017. Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable con- volutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1251-1258.
- Brian Dolhansky, Russ Howes, Ben Pflaum, Nicole Baram, and Cristian Canton Ferrer. 2019. The deepfake detection challenge (dfdc) preview dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.08854 (2019). · arXiv
- Ricard Durall, Margret Keuper, and Janis Keuper. 2020. Watch your up- convolution: Cnn based generative deep neural networks are failing to reproduce spectral distributions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 7890-7899.
- Jessica Fridrich and Jan Kodovsky. 2012. Rich models for steganalysis of digital images. IEEE Transactions on information Forensics and Security 7, 3 (2012), 868-882.
- Muhammad Ghifary, David Balduzzi, W Bastiaan Kleijn, and Mengjie Zhang. 2016. Scatter component analysis: A unified framework for domain adaptation and domain generalization. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 39, 7 (2016), 1414-1430.
- Muhammad Ghifary, W Bastiaan Kleijn, Mengjie Zhang, and David Balduzzi. 2015. Domain generalization for object recognition with multi-task autoencoders. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2551-2559.
- Bing Han, Xiaoguang Han, Hua Zhang, Jingzhi Li, and Xiaochun Cao. 2021. Fighting fake news: two stream network for deepfake detection via learnable SRM. IEEE Transactions on Biometrics, Behavior, and Identity Science 3, 3 (2021), 320-331.
- Juan Hu, Xin Liao, Jinwen Liang, Wenbo Zhou, and Zheng Qin. 2022. Finfer: Frame inference-based deepfake detection for high-visual-quality videos. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 36. 951-959.
- Da Li, Yongxin Yang, Yi-Zhe Song, and Timothy Hospedales. 2018. Learning to generalize: Meta-learning for domain generalization. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 32.
- Haoliang Li, Sinno Jialin Pan, Shiqi Wang, and Alex C Kot. 2018. Domain gener- alization with adversarial feature learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 5400-5409.
- Jiaming Li, Hongtao Xie, Jiahong Li, Zhongyuan Wang, and Yongdong Zhang. 2021. Frequency-aware discriminative feature learning supervised by single- center loss for face forgery detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 6458-6467.
- Lingzhi Li, Jianmin Bao, Hao Yang, Dong Chen, and Fang Wen. 2019. Faceshifter: Towards high fidelity and occlusion aware face swapping. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.13457 (2019). · arXiv
- Lingzhi Li, Jianmin Bao, Ting Zhang, Hao Yang, Dong Chen, Fang Wen, and Bain- ing Guo. 2020. Face x-ray for more general face forgery detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 5001-5010.
- Yuezun Li, Ming-Ching Chang, and Siwei Lyu. 2018. In ictu oculi: Exposing ai created fake videos by detecting eye blinking. In 2018 IEEE international workshop on information forensics and security (WIFS). IEEE, 1-7.
- Yuezun Li and Siwei Lyu. 2018. Exposing deepfake videos by detecting face warping artifacts. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.00656 (2018). · arXiv
- Zhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer, Trevor Darrell, and Saining Xie. 2022. A convnet for the 2020s. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 11976-11986.
- Yuchen Luo, Yong Zhang, Junchi Yan, and Wei Liu. 2021. Generalizing face forgery detection with high-frequency features. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 16317-16326.
- Iacopo Masi, Aditya Killekar, Royston Marian Mascarenhas, Shenoy Pratik Guru- datt, and Wael AbdAlmageed. 2020. Two-branch recurrent network for isolating deepfakes in videos. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23-28, 2020, Proceedings, Part VII 16. Springer, 667-684.
- Huy H Nguyen, Junichi Yamagishi, and Isao Echizen. 2019. Use of a capsule network to detect fake images and videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.12467 (2019). · arXiv
- Xingang Pan, Ping Luo, Jianping Shi, and Xiaoou Tang. 2018. Two at once: Enhancing learning and generalization capacities via ibn-net. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). 464-479.
- Yuyang Qian, Guojun Yin, Lu Sheng, Zixuan Chen, and Jing Shao. 2020. Think- ing in frequency: Face forgery detection by mining frequency-aware clues. In European conference on computer vision. Springer, 86-103.
- Andreas Rossler, Davide Cozzolino, Luisa Verdoliva, Christian Riess, Justus Thies, and Matthias Nießner. 2019. Faceforensics++: Learning to detect manipulated facial images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. 1-11.
- Shiv Shankar, Vihari Piratla, Soumen Chakrabarti, Siddhartha Chaudhuri, Preethi Jyothi, and Sunita Sarawagi. 2018. Generalizing across domains via cross-gradient training. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.10745 (2018). · arXiv
- Ke Sun, Hong Liu, Qixiang Ye, Yue Gao, Jianzhuang Liu, Ling Shao, and Ron- grong Ji. 2021. Domain general face forgery detection by learning to weight. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 35. 2638-2646.
- Mingxing Tan and Quoc Le. 2019. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 6105-6114.
- Mingxing Tan and Quoc Le. 2019. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 6105-6114.
- Xun Wang, Xintong Han, Weilin Huang, Dengke Dong, and Matthew R Scott. 2019. Multi-similarity loss with general pair weighting for deep metric learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 5022-5030.
- Xin Yang, Yuezun Li, and Siwei Lyu. 2019. Exposing deep fakes using inconsistent head poses. In ICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 8261-8265.
- Peipeng Yu, Jianwei Fei, Zhihua Xia, Zhili Zhou, and Jian Weng. 2022. Improv- ing generalization by commonality learning in face forgery detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 17 (2022), 547-558.
- Hanqing Zhao, Wenbo Zhou, Dongdong Chen, Tianyi Wei, Weiming Zhang, and Nenghai Yu. 2021. Multi-attentional deepfake detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2185-2194.
- Yinglin Zheng, Jianmin Bao, Dong Chen, Ming Zeng, and Fang Wen. 2021. Ex- ploring temporal coherence for more general video face forgery detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. 15044- 15054.
- Kaiyang Zhou, Yongxin Yang, Timothy Hospedales, and Tao Xiang. 2020. Deep domain-adversarial image generation for domain generalisation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 13025-13032.
- Authors
- Han, B., Li, J., Ren, W., Luo, M., Liu, J., & Cao, X.
- Affiliations
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Ant Group (China) (CN)
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2023-06-12
- Pages
- 153-161
- OpenAlex
- W4379806327
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.43
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ant Group
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Sun Yat-sen University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
- Keywords
- deepfake detection, meta-learning, domain generalization, weighted loss, domain shift, embedding space
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review