Cited by 67Speech and Audio ProcessingHuman Motion and AnimationGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

Video Rewrite: Driving Visual Speech with Audio

Bregler, Christoph, Covell, Michele, Slaney, Malcolm·2023·Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2

Abstract

Video Rewrite uses existing footage to create automatically new video of a person mouthing words that she did not speak in the original footage. This technique is useful in movie dubbing, for example, where the movie sequence can be modified to sync the actors' lip motions to the new soundtrack.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3596711.3596787

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 67

Authors
Bregler, C., Covell, M., & Slaney, M.
Affiliations
Interval Research Corporation, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Venue
Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-08
Pages
715-722
OpenAlex
W4385483513
Cited by
67
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
16.39
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Human Motion and Animation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
lip synchronization, visual speech, movie dubbing, lip movement, audio-video synchronization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review