Cited by 7Anomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

RAAD: Reinforced Adversarial Anomaly Detector

Woo, Simon S, Yoon, Daeyoung, Gim, Yuseung, Park, Eunseok·2024·Proceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing

Abstract

Developing a highly accurate anomaly detection system for realtime IT-based data management systems or Cyber-Physical system is challenging in the presence of unseen new malicious attacks and limited amounts of attack datasets to train. Especially, anomalous or attack samples can be very few compare to the entire data, and it generally becomes data mining in a highly imbalanced time-series dataset. To address aforementioned challenges, we propose a novel framework called Reinforced Adversarial Anomaly Detector (RAAD) based on Reinforcement Learning to mine and detect anomalies or attacks in the presence of very few attack or anomaly patterns in time-series. Our approach uses two adversarial agents, where one agent acts as an attacker and the other as a defender. The attacker agent learns a policy to disturb the defender agent by effectively sampling the defender's worst-performing trajectories from synthetically generated states provided by the environment, while the defender agent learns a policy that can distinguish between the normal and abnormal states. Upon successful training of two adversarial policies, the defender agent can effectively evaluate whether a new observation follows the distribution of normal states. In particular, RAAD overcomes the inherent overfitting issue, which other approaches have, through adversarial training and Reinforcement Learning. Using multiple real-world anomaly and attack detection datasets, we demonstrate that RAAD outperforms the several other baseline approaches in identifying abnormal patterns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3605098.3635920

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reviewed simulation-data studies show two representative ways of using simulation: cyber-range environments (e.g., CyberBattleSim) where the entire attack-defense process is simulated, and Markov game settings that reuse real ICS/CPS datasets while generating perturbed trajectories to evaluate robustness against unseen attacks.

    “Second, the reviewed studies show two representative ways of using simulation: cyber-range environments such as CyberBattleSim, where the entire attack-defense process is simulated [119], and Markov game settings that reuse real ICS/CPS datasets while generating perturbed trajectories to evaluate robustness against unseen attacks [120,121].”
  • In contrast to other data types that mainly target offline detection accuracy, simulation data are primarily used to learn adaptive defense policies (e.g., dynamic threshold control, attack-defense strategy selection, policy-based mitigation) in MDP or game-theoretic environments.

    “First, in contrast to other data types that mainly target offline detection accuracy, simulation data are primarily used to learn adaptive defense policies such as dynamic threshold control, attack-defense strategy selection, and policy-based mitigation in MDP or game-theoretic environments [119-121].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 7

Authors
Woo, S. S., Yoon, D., Gim, Y., & Park, E.
Affiliations
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
  • Woowa Brothers Corp, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Kakao Corporation (South Korea) (KR)
Venue
Proceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-04-08
Pages
883-891
OpenAlex
W4398186408
Cited by
7
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.02
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
anomaly detection, attack detection, reinforcement learning, adversarial training, cyber-physical systems, time series anomaly detection, class imbalance, overfitting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review