Cited by 21Artificial Intelligence in EducationInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Literature Understanding and Review: An Empirical Study among Early-stage Scholars

Wang, Jiyao, Hu, Haolong, Wang, Zuyuan, Yan, Song, Sheng, Youyu, He, Dengbo·2024·Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT makes LLM-based academic tools possible. However, little research has empirically evaluated how scholars perform different types of academic tasks with LLMs. Through an empirical study followed by a semi-structured interview, we assessed 48 early-stage scholars’ performance in conducting core academic activities (i.e., paper reading and literature reviews) under different levels of time pressure. Before conducting the tasks, participants received different training programs regarding the limitations and capabilities of the LLMs. After completing the tasks, participants completed an interview. Quantitative data regarding the influence of time pressure, task type, and training program on participants’ performance in academic tasks was analyzed. Semi-structured interviews provided additional information on the influential factors of task performance, participants’ perceptions of LLMs, and concerns about integrating LLMs into academic workflows. The findings can guide more appropriate usage and design of LLM-based tools in assisting academic work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3613904.3641917

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 21

Authors
Wang, J., Hu, H., Wang, Z., Yan, S., Sheng, Y., & He, D.
Affiliations
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-05-11
Pages
1-18
OpenAlex
W4396832709
Cited by
21
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 1
FWCI
8.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project (No. 2023A03J0011)
  • Guangzhou Science and Technology Program City-University Joint Funding Project (No. 2023A03J0001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
large language models, time pressure, ChatGPT, paper reading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review