Co-design Partners as Transformative Learners: Imagining Ideal Technology for Schools by Centering Speculative Relationships
Open accessAbstract
Emergent technologies like artificial intelligence have been proposed to address issues of inequity in schools, yet tend to ossify the status quo because they address needs within an already inequitable system. In this paper, we draw from speculative participatory approaches across HCI and the learning sciences, and present a novel approach to co-design that forefronts supporting historically minoritized youth in developing transformative agency to change their schools based on their valued hopes, practices, and concerns. We argue that when co-design spaces forefront relational development, expansive technological objects emerge as a byproduct. We present a case study of expansive dreaming with U.S. historically minoritized students about the use of artificial intelligence to support classroom collaboration. Methodologically, we demonstrate how physically visiting spaces of collective agency serves as a powerful perceptual bridge to imagining joyful, equitable possibilities for schooling. Our approach yields new visions for schooling and new metaphors for artificial intelligence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CoBi was originally proposed by a group of youth participants during a three-day, in-person co-design workshop with 15 youth of color who explored how AI could support collaboration.
“CoBi was originally proposed by a group of youth participants during a three-day, in-person co-design workshop with 15 youth of color who explored how AI could support collaboration (Chang et al., 2024).”
From A Feasibility and Implementation Integrity Study of the Community Builder (CoBi): An AI-based Collaboration Support System in K-12 Classrooms (2025) · cites this paper as Chang et al., 2024
Cites
Ambiguity as a resource for design
Gaver, W. W., Beaver, J., & Benford, S. (2003) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/642611.642653 · Cited by 1,348 · see citing works
Towards an Agile Approach to Adapting Dynamic Collaboration Support to Student Needs
Adamson, D., Dyke, G., Jang, H., & Rosé, C. P. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-013-0012-6 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, S., Wang, H., & Yi, X. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757594 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Chang, M. A., Tissenbaum, M., Philip, T. M., & D’Mello, S. K. (2025) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100364 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationBreideband, T., Bush, J. B., Reitman, J. G., Rose, S., Weatherley, J., Penuel, W. R., & D’Mello, S. K. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-025-00509-2 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“CoBi was originally proposed by a group of youth participants during a three-day, in-person co-design workshop with 15 youth of color who explored how AI could support collaboration (Chang et al., 2024).”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Chang, M. A., Wong, R. Y., Breideband, T., Philip, T. M., McKoy, A., Cortez, A., & D'Mello, S. K.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Institute of Cognitive Science, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado Boulder, United States
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2024-05-11
- Pages
- 1-15
- OpenAlex
- W4396833042
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 15
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2019805)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- co-design, speculative design, artificial intelligence in education, educational equity, transformative agency, relational development, classroom collaboration, collective agency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review