DiaryMate: Understanding User Perceptions and Experience in Human-AI Collaboration for Personal Journaling
Open accessAbstract
With their generative capabilities, large language models (LLMs) have transformed the role of technological writing assistants from simple editors to writing collaborators. Such a transition emphasizes the need for understanding user perception and experience, such as balancing user intent and the involvement of LLMs across various writing domains in designing writing assistants. In this study, we delve into the less explored domain of personal writing, focusing on the use of LLMs in introspective activities. Specifically, we designed DiaryMate, a system that assists users in journal writing with LLM. Through a 10-day field study (N=24), we observed that participants used the diverse sentences generated by the LLM to reflect on their past experiences from multiple perspectives. However, we also observed that they are over-relying on the LLM, often prioritizing its emotional expressions over their own. Drawing from these findings, we discuss design considerations when leveraging LLMs in a personal writing practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 75
- Authors
- Kim, T., Shin, D., Kim, Y.-H., & Hong, H.
- Affiliations
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Human Centered Design and Engineering, University of Washington, United States
- NAVER Cloud (South Korea) (KR)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2024-05-11
- Pages
- 1-15
- OpenAlex
- W4396831908
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 24.17
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- KAIST Institutional Repository (KAIST) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research foundation of Korea (RS-2023-00262527)
- Institute of Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2022-0-00064)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Keywords
- large language models, human-AI collaboration, writing assistants, self-reflection, user experience, overreliance on AI, emotional expression, personal writing practice, LLM-generated text
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review