Cited by 11Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Beyond Dollars: Unveiling the Deeper Layers of Online Romance Scams Introducing “Body Scam”

Open access
Amirkhani, Sima, Alizadeh, Fatemeh, Randall, Dave, Stevens, Gunnar·2024·Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

As online romance surges, so does the popularity of online romance scam. While existing research predominantly emphasizes financial scams, our study introduces “body scam” which is not for financial gain, but just for sexual abuse. We conducted interviews with 20 victims of online dating fraud with sexual scam experience in Iran, delving into their story in a context where dating is legally, socially, and normatively complex. Through inductive coding, our findings reveal a notable shift in victimization risks, particularly for women, with a growing emphasis on predatory sexual intent rather than purely financial motivation. This study not only sheds light on the evolving landscape of online dating risks but also underscores the significance of understanding the nuances of sexual intentions in the Iranian context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3613905.3651004

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grooming includes exchanging intimate photos and messages (sexting).

    “or exchanging intimate photos and messages (i.e., sexting, 5i; Abubakari, 2024; Amirkhani et al., 2024).”

    From Love as Bait: A Scoping Review and Crime Script Analysis of Online Romance Scams (2026) · cites this paper as Amirkhani et al., 2024

  • Sextortion is a squeeze strategy where the scammer coerces the victim into sending sexually explicit images or uses previously shared intimate material to blackmail them.

    “One of these strategies is sextortion (8a), where the scammer coerces the victim into sending sexually explicit images or uses previously shared intimate material to blackmail them (Anesa, 2020; Amirkhani et al., 2024; Cross, 2023; Cross et al., 2024; Cross & Lee, 2022; Whitty, 2015).”

    From Love as Bait: A Scoping Review and Crime Script Analysis of Online Romance Scams (2026) · cites this paper as Amirkhani et al., 2024

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amirkhani, S., Alizadeh, F., Randall, D., & Stevens, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Siegen (DE)
  • Information Systems and New Media, University of Siegen, Germany
Venue
Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-05-11
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4396833481
Cited by
11
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7
FWCI
4.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
This project is supported by funds of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) funded by the European Union (NextGenerationEU).
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
online dating fraud, sexual abuse, women victims, victimization risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review