Cited by 11Intelligence, Security, War StrategyTopic ModelingArtificial Intelligence in Games

FABULA: Intelligence Report Generation Using Retrieval-Augmented Narrative Construction

Open access
Ranade, Priyanka, Joshi, Anupam·2023·Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining

Abstract

Narrative construction is the process of representing disparate event information into a logical plot structure that models an end to end story. Intelligence analysis is an example of a domain that can benefit tremendously from narrative construction techniques, particularly in aiding analysts during the largely manual and costly process of synthesizing event information into comprehensive intelligence reports. Manual intelligence report generation is often prone to challenges such as integrating dynamic event information, writing fine-grained queries, and closing information gaps. This motivates the development of a system that retrieves and represents critical aspects of events in a form that aids in automatic generation of intelligence reports.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3625007.3627505

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coarse-grained retrieval units theoretically can provide more relevant information but may contain redundant content, which could distract the retriever and language models in downstream tasks.

    “Coarse-grained retrieval units theoretically can provide more relevant information for the problem, but they may also contain redundant content, which could distract the retriever and language models in downstream tasks [50], [87].”

    From Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Information Retrieval & Knowledge Representation and Retrieval-Augmented Intelligence Report Generation sections describe retrieval and its use in prompting, but do not discuss the size of retrieval units. Searches for coarse-grained units, redundant content, and distraction of retrievers or language models found no passage addressing that trade-off. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Wendy G Lehnert. Plot units and narrative summarization. Cognitive science, 5(4):293-331, 1981.
  2. Priyanka Ranade, Sanorita Dey, Anupam Joshi, and Tim Finin. Com- putational understanding of narratives: A survey. IEEE Access, 2022.
  3. Kristin Thompson. Storytelling in the new Hollywood: Understanding classical narrative technique. Harvard University Press, 1999.
  4. Faten El Outa, Matteo Francia, Patrick Marcel, Veronika Peralta, and Panos Vassiliadis. Supporting the generation of data narratives. In ER Forum/Posters/Demos, pages 168-172, 2020.
  5. Xianshu Zhu and Tim Oates. Finding story chains in newswire articles. In 2012 IEEE 13th International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration (IRI), pages 93-100. IEEE, 2012.
  6. Dafna Shahaf and Carlos Guestrin. Connecting the dots between news articles. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 2010.
  7. Gabriel Pui Cheong Fung, Jeffrey Xu Yu, Huan Liu, and Philip S Yu. Time-dependent event hierarchy construction. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 300-309, 2007.
  8. Carlo Meghini, Valentina Bartalesi, and Daniele Metilli. Representing narratives in digital libraries: The narrative ontology. Semantic Web, 12(2):241-264, 2021.
  9. Amit Singhal, Chris Buckley, and Manclar Mitra. Pivoted document length normalization. In Acm sigir forum, volume 51, pages 176-184. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2017.
  10. Nick Craswell, W Bruce Croft, Maarten de Rijke, Jiafeng Guo, and Bhaskar Mitra. Neural information retrieval: introduction to the special issue. Information Retrieval Journal, 21:107-110, 2018.
  11. Laura Dietz, Alexander Kotov, and Edgar Meij. Utilizing knowledge graphs for text-centric information retrieval. In The 41st international ACM SIGIR conference on research & development in information retrieval, pages 1387-1390, 2018.
  12. Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Dhanush Bekal, Yi Luan, Mirella Lapata, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. Text generation from knowledge graphs with graph transformers. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:, 2019.
  13. Xavier Schmitt, Sylvain Kubler, Jérémy Robert, Mike Papadakis, and Yves LeTraon. A replicable comparison study of ner software: Stanfordnlp, nltk, opennlp, spacy, gate. In 2019 Sixth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS), pages 338-343. IEEE, 2019.
  14. Jakub Piskorski, Nicolas Stefanovitch, Giovanni Da San Martino, and Preslav Nakov. Semeval-2023 task 3: Detecting the category, the framing, and the persuasion techniques in online news in a multi- lingual setup. In Proceedings of the The 17th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2023), pages 2343-2361, 2023.
  15. Leo Gao, Stella Biderman, Sid Black, Laurence Golding, Travis Hoppe, Charles Foster, Jason Phang, Horace He, Anish Thite, Noa Nabeshima, et al. The pile: An 800gb dataset of diverse text for language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00027, 2020. · arXiv
  16. Kurt Shuster, Spencer Poff, Moya Chen, Douwe Kiela, and Jason Weston. Retrieval augmentation reduces hallucination in conversation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.07567, 2021. · arXiv
  17. Chin-Yew Lin. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of sum- maries. In Text summarization branches out, pages 74-81, 2004.
  18. Mary L McHugh. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia medica, 22(3):276-282, 2012.
  19. I Elaine Allen and Christopher A Seaman. Likert scales and data analyses. Quality progress, 40(7):64-65, 2007.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ranade, P., & Joshi, A.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-11-06
Pages
603-610
OpenAlex
W4387928582
Cited by
11
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3
FWCI
14.94
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
Keywords
narrative construction, retrieval-augmented generation, plot structure, information gap, intelligence analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review