The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Integrating Content Authenticity with DASH Video Streaming
Abstract
The importance of content authenticity and provenance has significantly increased in the digital era, due to the rampant spread of misinformation, which makes it necessary to build safe and trustworthy systems. To this effect, the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) has emerged as a leading organization that provides content provenance (https://c2pa.org/), certifying the source and history of media content, which empowers users to assess the authenticity and trustworthiness of a piece of content. The group has created the specification and various tools for generating, attaching, and verifying C2PA manifest for different media assets such as audio, image, and video files. However, there is still a gap when it comes to video streaming, where fragmented MP4 (fMP4) files are commonly used. Although the C2PA standard has specified the manifest generation of fMP4 files, the verification and visualization of the result during consumption is left unspecified. In this paper, we introduce a client-side implementation of C2PA validation for video streaming. Our solution builds on top of DASH.js for the player engine and video.js for the player UI. As the content plays, the provenance verification result is displayed on the player UI through the timeline and an C2PA icon, reflecting whether the verification has passed for the content being viewed. Viewers can also quickly check additional information, such as the content authors and editing history, using a second-level menu by clicking the icon. Our demo showcases that our solution provides robust verification, smooth playback, and an intuitive UI for users to stream videos with content authenticity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“provenance mechanisms are constrained by software supply chain realities, including configuration drift, non-deterministic builds and packaging, and inconsistent attestation adoption”
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 10.1145/3368860.3368866 · DOI
- 10.1145/3485441.3485650 · DOI
- 10.1145/3458305.3459599 · DOI
- 10.1109/ISM.2007.4412382 · DOI
- Yoshimichi Nakatsuka, Ardalan Amiri Sani, Sharad Agarwal, Gene Tsudik, et al. 2021. Vronicle: A System for Producing Videos with Verifiable Provenance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.12712 (2021). · arXiv
- 10.1145/1943552.1943572 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hameed, N. A. (2026) · International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems · doi:10.22266/ijies2026.0831.27
Metadata
- Authors
- Petrangeli, S., Wang, H., Fisher, M., Kozma, D., Mahamli, M., Blumenthal, P., & Parsons, A.
- Affiliations
- Adobe Systems (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Systems Conference 2024 on ZZZ
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2024-04-15
- Pages
- 492-498
- OpenAlex
- W4394881793
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Rights Management and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Multimedia Communication and Technology
- Keywords
- content provenance, content authenticity, C2PA, client-side validation, provenance verification, misinformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating Content Authenticity with DASH Video Streaming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3625468.3652198
- The paper
- Petrangeli, S., Wang, H., Fisher, M., Kozma, D., Mahamli, M., Blumenthal, P., & Parsons, A. (2024). Integrating Content Authenticity with DASH Video Streaming. Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Systems Conference 2024 on ZZZ. https://doi.org/10.1145/3625468.3652198