The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Finding Neurodivergent Community in Computing Education
Abstract
For computing to serve humanity, all individuals must be able to feel safe within computing. While prior work has surfaced how hegemonic racial and gendered expectations manifest in computing, neurodivergent identities have received far less attention. Existing neurodiversity narratives look to deconstruct mechanisms that privilege certain ways of thinking and being over others, but those narratives are scarce within computing. Critically, narratives are constructed in dialogue with community, and prior SIGCSE conferences have largely lacked official support for this construction, relegating those conversations to corners and edges within the conference space. This BoF continues work from last SIGCSE in supporting the construction of narratives that center neurodivergent identities and creating neurodivergent communities. We have three goals for this space: 1) cultivate community around an "invisible" identity for which public disclosure is often problematic, 2) give an explicit space for folks to "unmask" within a broader conference where masking is typically expected, and 3) utilize existing work to create connections around more specific aspects of neurodivergence.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“First, accounts of masking describe how clear ground rules and predictable feedback can lower the social costs of participation [15, 18].”
From Teaching Participatory Inclusive IT Design with a Neurodiversity Lens in Computing Education (2025) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“Embedding participatory formats, with explicit preparation for language and communication, scheduled reflection, protected feedback, and resourcing for facilitation, reduces ad hoc 'access labor' and enables sustained peer involvement and community building (e.g., spaces to 'unmask') [4, 15].”
From Teaching Participatory Inclusive IT Design with a Neurodiversity Lens in Computing Education (2025) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teaching Participatory Inclusive IT Design with a Neurodiversity Lens in Computing Education
Hermann, J., Jansen, N., Richter, U., Fleer, A., & Doganün, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 25th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/3769994.3770007 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirdani-Ryan, M., & Ibrahim, O.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2024-03-14
- Pages
- 1913-1913
- OpenAlex
- W4392861448
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1539179, 1703304, 1836813, 2031265, 2100296, 2122950, 2137834, 2137312, 2023338658)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Keywords
- neurodivergence, computing education, masking, unmasking, SIGCSE, identity disclosure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Finding Neurodivergent Community in Computing Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3626253.3635372
- The paper
- Kirdani-Ryan, M., & Ibrahim, O. (2024). Finding Neurodivergent Community in Computing Education. Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626253.3635372