Cited by 4Artificial Intelligence in EducationEducational Technology and PedagogyEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

The Empowerment and Impact of ChatGPT Technology on Foreign Language Education in Colleges and Universities

Open access
Li, Huiting, Wang, Yakun·2023·Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Educational Technology Management

Abstract

OpenAI, an American artificial intelligence laboratory, launched ChatGPT, an intelligent chatting tool at the end of late 2022, which has caused great repercussions all over the world. ChatGPT technology has already had an important impact on education in today's world, so what kind of empowerment and impact will it have on the teaching and learning of foreign languages in Chinese colleges and universities? This article combines the author's experience of using ChatGPT, firstly describes the new teacher-student relationship it generates, then discusses how ChatGPT empowers foreign language students and teachers in colleges and universities and summarises several aspects of how ChatGPT can be applied to foreign language students and teachers in colleges and universities. At the end, the article reveals the potential risks, limitations and implications of ChatGPT on foreign language education in colleges and universities in the future and deepens the knowledge and understanding of the utility of artificial intelligence in foreign language education in colleges and universities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3637907.3637950

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers in HCI have produced studies characterizing user values, social dynamics, and professional contexts that influence ownership preferences and attitudes toward AI assistance.

    “Researchers in HCI have worked extensively to investigate these dimensions, producing studies characterizing user values, social dynamics, and professional contexts [9,39,53,63,77,105] that influence ownership preferences and how they shape users' attitudes toward AI assistance.”

    From Co-Writing with AI, on Human Terms: Aligning Research with User Demands Across the Writing Process (2025) · cites this paper as [77]

    Section 2.1 discusses how ChatGPT changes teacher–student dynamics, and the Conclusion discusses teachers’ and students’ roles in using AI for foreign-language education. The paper does not characterize ownership preferences or show how those preferences shape attitudes toward AI assistance; it also does not present itself as an HCI study of those questions. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

  • Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models

    Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., & Amodei, D. (2020) · arXiv · Cited by 1,749 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “Recently, researchers have discovered the scaling laws of language models, i.e., when the size of a language model grows exponentially, its performance increases linearly [4].”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Liu, C., Liao, M., Chang, C. and Lin, H. 2022. An Analysis of Childrens Interaction with an AI Chatbot and its Impact on their Interest in Reading. Computers & Education. Https: / /doi.org /10.1016 /j.compedu.2022.104576chil.html. · DOI
  2. Yang, H., Kim, H., Lee, J. H. and Shin, D. 2022. Implementation of an AI Chatbot as an English Conversation Partner in EFL Speaking Classes. ReCALL, 34( 3) : 327-343.
  3. Wei,J. et al. 2022. Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models[EB/OL]. Retrieved from https: //arxiv.org
  4. Baidoo-Anu, D. and Leticia, O. A. 2023. Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Available at SSRN 4337484.
  5. Fuchs*, K. and Aguilos, V. 2023. "Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Empirical Insights from Students about Using ChatGPT, " International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 13(9):1365-1371, 2023.
  6. Yu, N. and Zhang, Y. 2023.The Impact of ChatGPT/Generative Artificial Intelligence on Education: a New Frontier of Great Power Gaming. Jour- nal of East China Normal University (Education Science Edition),41(07):15- 25.DOI:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2023.07.002. · DOI
  7. Susnjak,T. 2022. ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?[EB/OL].Retrieved from https: //arxiv.org

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, H., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Guangxi University of Finance and Economics (CN)
  • Nanning University (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Educational Technology Management
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-11-03
Pages
29-34
OpenAlex
W4391409775
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.03
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Conference on Educational Technology Management (ICETM) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • 2023 Guangxi Higher Education Undergraduate Teaching Reform Project (2023JGB353)
  • 2023 National Research Project on Foreign Language Teaching in Colleges and Universities (2023GX0019)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
ChatGPT, foreign language teaching, higher education, teacher-student relationship, artificial intelligence in education, student empowerment, teacher empowerment, Chinese universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review