Cited by 29Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDigital Media and Visual Art

The Chosen One: Consistent Characters in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models

Open access
Avrahami, Omri, Hertz, Amir, Vinker, Yael, Arar, Moab, Fruchter, Shlomi, Fried, Ohad, Cohen-Or, Daniel, Lischinski, Dani·2024·Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Conference Papers

Abstract

Recent advances in text-to-image generation models have unlocked vast potential for visual creativity. However, the users that use these models struggle with the generation of consistent characters, a crucial aspect for numerous real-world applications such as story visualization, game development, asset design, advertising, and more. Current methods typically rely on multiple pre-existing images of the target character or involve labor-intensive manual processes. In this work, we propose a fully automated solution for consistent character generation, with the sole input being a text prompt. We introduce an iterative procedure that, at each stage, identifies a coherent set of images sharing a similar identity and extracts a more consistent identity from this set. Our quantitative analysis demonstrates that our method strikes a better balance between prompt alignment and identity consistency compared to the baseline methods, and these findings are reinforced by a user study. To conclude, we showcase several practical applications of our approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3641519.3657430

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Avrahami, O., Hertz, A., Vinker, Y., Arar, M., Fruchter, S., Fried, O., Cohen-Or, D., & Lischinski, D.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Google (Israel) (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Reichman University (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University, Israel
Venue
Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Conference Papers
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-07-13
Pages
1-12
OpenAlex
W4400582159
Cited by
29
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6
FWCI
5.99
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Digital Media and Visual Art
Keywords
text-to-image generation, character consistency, identity consistency, prompt alignment, character generation, story visualization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review