Cited by 45Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisFace recognition and analysisHuman Motion and Animation

X-Portrait: Expressive Portrait Animation with Hierarchical Motion Attention

Open access
Xie, You, Xu, Hongyi, Song, Guoxian, Wang, Chao, Shi, Yichun, Luo, Linjie·2024·Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Conference Papers 24

Abstract

We propose X-Portrait, an innovative conditional diffusion model tailored for generating expressive and temporally coherent portrait animation. Specifically, given a single portrait as appearance reference, we aim to animate it with motion derived from a driving video, capturing both highly dynamic and subtle facial expressions along with wide-range head movements. As its core, we leverage the generative prior of a pre-trained diffusion model as the rendering backbone, while achieve fine-grained head pose and expression control with novel controlling signals within the framework of ControlNet. In contrast to conventional coarse explicit controls such as facial landmarks, our motion control module is learned to interpret the dynamics directly from the original driving RGB inputs. The motion accuracy is further enhanced with a patch-based local control module that effectively enhance the motion attention to small-scale nuances like eyeball positions. Notably, to mitigate the identity leakage from the driving signals, we train our motion control modules with scaling-augmented cross-identity images, ensuring maximized disentanglement from the appearance reference modules. Experimental results demonstrate the universal effectiveness of X-Portrait across a diverse range of facial portraits and expressive driving sequences, and showcase its proficiency in generating captivating portrait animations with consistently maintained identity characteristics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3641519.3657459

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Features in the U-Net's self-attention layers can reflect the consistency of image appearance.

    “It is well known that the features in the U-Net's selfattention layers can reflect the consistency of image appearance.”

    From DiffSim: Taming Diffusion Models for Evaluating Visual Similarity (2024) · cites this paper as [51]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xie, Y., Xu, H., Song, G., Wang, C., Shi, Y., & Luo, L.
Affiliations
ByteDance (China) (CN)
Venue
Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Conference Papers 24
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-07-13
Pages
1-11
OpenAlex
W4400573497
Cited by
45
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 3
FWCI
9.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Human Motion and Animation
Keywords
facial expression animation, conditional diffusion models, ControlNet, facial expression control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review