Cited by 3Network Security and Intrusion DetectionAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

AnomGraphAdv: Enhancing Anomaly and Network Intrusion Detection in Wireless Networks Using Adversarial Training and Temporal Graph Networks

Bajpai, Supriya, Krishna Murthy, Pagadala, Kumar, Niraj·2024·Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks

Abstract

Detecting DoS attacks and other malicious activities in wireless networks is crucial for cybersecurity. The challenge arises due to the unlabeled nature of the majority of available network data, mainly because of the high volume and diverse data streams from numerous sensors. The complex temporal correlation patterns and highly varying signatures pose a significant challenge to timeseries-based anomalies and intrusion detection systems. Additionally, the evolving nature of networks and dynamically changing attack patterns lead to zero-day attacks (new, unknown threats). The rarity of anomalies and intrusions, coupled with the highly imbalanced nature of the dataset, adds complexity to the challenge. To address this problem, we propose the AnomGraphAdv Network, a novel unsupervised approach with adversarial training for Anomalies and Network Intrusion Detection in multivariate timeseries data. We introduce a novel temporal graph network and jointly use it with a temporal self-attention mechanism inside the encoder to learn both temporal and non-temporal patterns in the data. Additionally, we propose a custom-designed loss function that trains the model adversarially to minimize the reconstruction error for normal events while maximizing it for anomalous events to amplify subtle anomalies. This loss function simultaneously enhances the contrast between global and local-temporal correlation patterns. Extensive evaluations on five benchmark datasets demonstrate that the AnomGraphAdv Network significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of AUROC and F1-score.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3643833.3656130

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Table 3 shows that some models such as [76,77,104,106] have adopted the principles of the dynamic graph approach to construct graphs at runtimes based on the dynamics represented in the MTSs.

    “Table 3 also shows that some models such as [76,77,104,106] have adopted the principles of the dynamic graph approach to endow the DNN models with the ability to construct the graphs at runtimes based on the dynamics represented in the MTSs.”
  • By using sparse and variational autoencoder architectures, TVGeAN can capture intrinsic knowledge from a small training space and generalize it effectively without using complex approaches.

    “Furthermore, by using sparse and variational autoencoder architectures, TVGeAN can capture the intrinsic knowledge from a small training space and generalize it effectively without using complex approaches, as is the case with the models that use the dynamic graph approach, e.g., refs.[103-106].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bajpai, S., Krishna Murthy, P., & Kumar, N.
Affiliations
  • Fujitsu (Japan) (JP)
  • Artificial Intelligence Lab, Fujitsu Research of India, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Venue
Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-05-27
Pages
113-122
OpenAlex
W4398131564
Cited by
3
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks (WiSec) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
anomaly detection, network intrusion detection, wireless sensor networks, denial-of-service attacks, adversarial training, temporal graph networks, temporal self-attention, multivariate time series, zero-day attacks, class imbalance, unsupervised learning, reconstruction loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review