AnomGraphAdv: Enhancing Anomaly and Network Intrusion Detection in Wireless Networks Using Adversarial Training and Temporal Graph Networks
Abstract
Detecting DoS attacks and other malicious activities in wireless networks is crucial for cybersecurity. The challenge arises due to the unlabeled nature of the majority of available network data, mainly because of the high volume and diverse data streams from numerous sensors. The complex temporal correlation patterns and highly varying signatures pose a significant challenge to timeseries-based anomalies and intrusion detection systems. Additionally, the evolving nature of networks and dynamically changing attack patterns lead to zero-day attacks (new, unknown threats). The rarity of anomalies and intrusions, coupled with the highly imbalanced nature of the dataset, adds complexity to the challenge. To address this problem, we propose the AnomGraphAdv Network, a novel unsupervised approach with adversarial training for Anomalies and Network Intrusion Detection in multivariate timeseries data. We introduce a novel temporal graph network and jointly use it with a temporal self-attention mechanism inside the encoder to learn both temporal and non-temporal patterns in the data. Additionally, we propose a custom-designed loss function that trains the model adversarially to minimize the reconstruction error for normal events while maximizing it for anomalous events to amplify subtle anomalies. This loss function simultaneously enhances the contrast between global and local-temporal correlation patterns. Extensive evaluations on five benchmark datasets demonstrate that the AnomGraphAdv Network significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of AUROC and F1-score.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Table 3 shows that some models such as [76,77,104,106] have adopted the principles of the dynamic graph approach to construct graphs at runtimes based on the dynamics represented in the MTSs.
“Table 3 also shows that some models such as [76,77,104,106] have adopted the principles of the dynamic graph approach to endow the DNN models with the ability to construct the graphs at runtimes based on the dynamics represented in the MTSs.”
From TVGeAN: Tensor Visibility Graph-Enhanced Attention Network for Versatile Multivariant Time Series Learning Tasks (2024) · cites this paper as [104]
By using sparse and variational autoencoder architectures, TVGeAN can capture intrinsic knowledge from a small training space and generalize it effectively without using complex approaches.
“Furthermore, by using sparse and variational autoencoder architectures, TVGeAN can capture the intrinsic knowledge from a small training space and generalize it effectively without using complex approaches, as is the case with the models that use the dynamic graph approach, e.g., refs.[103-106].”
From TVGeAN: Tensor Visibility Graph-Enhanced Attention Network for Versatile Multivariant Time Series Learning Tasks (2024) · cites this paper as [104]
Cites
Robust Anomaly Detection for Multivariate Time Series through Stochastic Recurrent Neural Network
Su, Y., Zhao, Y., Niu, C., Liu, R., Sun, W., & Pei, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3292500.3330672 · Cited by 1,804 · see citing works
USAD: UnSupervised Anomaly Detection on Multivariate Time Series
Audibert, J., Michiardi, P., Guyard, F., Marti, S., & Zuluaga, M. A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3394486.3403392 · Cited by 1,094 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baz, M. (2024) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math12213320 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bajpai, S., Krishna Murthy, P., & Kumar, N.
- Affiliations
- Fujitsu (Japan) (JP)
- Artificial Intelligence Lab, Fujitsu Research of India, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2024-05-27
- Pages
- 113-122
- OpenAlex
- W4398131564
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks (WiSec) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Keywords
- anomaly detection, network intrusion detection, wireless sensor networks, denial-of-service attacks, adversarial training, temporal graph networks, temporal self-attention, multivariate time series, zero-day attacks, class imbalance, unsupervised learning, reconstruction loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review