The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Socratic Mind: Scalable Oral Assessment Powered By AI
Abstract
Interactive teaching methods often lead to higher levels of student engagement with course material. Yet, as class sizes increase, the demand on teaching staff becomes unsustainable. Our solution, Socratic Mind, employs Large Language Models to provide scalable, interactive oral assessments by functioning as a virtual instructor. This paper discusses the outcomes and user feedback from the preliminary implementation of our system in a large classroom environment with 600 students.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In response, emerging research has investigated the potential of integrating GenAI technologies as a robust opportunity to effectively scale and automate Socratic pedagogical strategies (Hung et al., 2024 ; Fakour & Imani, 2025 ; Favero et al., 2024 ).”
From Socratic Mind: Impact of a Novel GenAI-Powered Formative Assessment Tool on Student Learning and Higher-Order Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as Hung et al., 2024
Citations
Cites
Chain-Of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q. V., & Zhou, D. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1800 · Cited by 4,505
Yang, Y.-T. C., Newby, T. J., & Bill, R. L. (2005) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_4 · Cited by 296
Towards Inclusive Learning in Higher Education
(2006) · doi:10.4324/9780203088623 · Cited by 64
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- Tarek Ait Baha, Mohamed El Hajji, Youssef Es-Saady, and Hammou Fadili. 2023. The impact of educational chatbot on student learning experience. Education and Information Technologies (2023), 1--24.
- Beng Heng Ang, Sujatha Das Gollapalli, and See Kiong Ng. 2023. Socratic Question Generation: A Novel Dataset, Models, and Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 147--165.
- 10.1080/15512160903253277 · DOI
- 10.9734/BJESBS/2015/17825 · doi:10.9734/bjesbs/2015/17825
- 10.1145/3573051.3593379 · DOI
- 10.1186/s41239-022-00362--6 · doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00362--6
- 10.3138/jvme.38.2.157 · DOI
- David E. Gardner and Andrea N. Giordano. 2023a. The Challenges and Value of Undergraduate Oral Exams in the Physical Chemistry Classroom: A Useful Tool in the Assessment Toolbox. Journal of Chemical Education (2023).
- 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00011 · DOI
- 10.1145/1151954.1067487 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781351186193-7 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12909-023-04134--2 · doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04134--2
- 10.1080/02602938.2010.515012 · DOI · Paper page
- Solomon Hykes and Inc. Docker. 2013. Docker: A Software Container Platform. https://www.docker.com Accessed: 2024-05--15.
- 10.3991/ijac.v16i1.35437 · DOI
- Nischal Ashok Kumar and Andrew Lan. 2024. Improving Socratic Question Generation using Data Augmentation and Preference Optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.00199 (2024). · arXiv
- 10.1007/978-3-030-23522-2_45 · DOI
- 10.2991/ictte-17.2017.56 · doi:10.2991/ictte-17.2017.56
- 10.21009/jisae.v9i1.32928 · doi:10.21009/jisae.v9i1.32928
- 10.1145/3573051.3593393 · DOI
- 10.18653/v1/2023.bea-1.62 · DOI
- Mansi Phute Alec Helbling Matthew Hull ShengYun Peng Sebastian Szyller Cory Cornelius and Duen Horng Chau. 2024. LLM Self Defense: By Self Examination LLMs Know They Are Being Tricked. arxiv: 2308.07308 [cs.CL] · arXiv
- 10.18260/1--2--43137 · doi:10.18260/1--2--43137
- Daniele Ramella. 2019. Oral exams: A deeply neglected tool for formative assessment in chemistry. In Active Learning in General Chemistry: Specific Interventions. ACS Publications, 79--89.
- 10.1145/3478431.3499382 · DOI
- 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673190 · doi:10.1109/fie.2010.5673190
- Pararth Shah, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Gokhan Tür, Abhinav Rastogi, Ankur Bapna, Neha Nayak, and Larry Heck. 2018. Building a conversational agent overnight with dialogue self-play. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.04871 (2018). · arXiv
- Ana"is Tack and Chris Piech. 2022. The AI Teacher Test: Measuring the Pedagogical Ability of Blender and GPT-3 in Educational Dialogues. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. 522.
- Joseph Tey and Shaurya Sinha. 2024. Sherpa. https://sherpalabs.co/manifesto. Accessed: 4/15/2024. · doi:10.5121/ijmvsc.2024.15102
- 10.22146/jpki.45131 · DOI
- 10.1145/3626252.3630773 · DOI
Cited by
Lee, J., Hung, J.-T., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Popescu, D., Cui, C. Z., Grigoryan, G., Joyner, D. A., & Harmon, S. W. (2026) · Technology, Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-026-10007-6 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hung, J.-T., Cui, C., Popescu, D. M., Chatterjee, S., & Starner, T.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2024-07-09
- Pages
- 340-345
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Socratic Mind: Scalable Oral Assessment Powered By AI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3657604.3664661
- The paper
- Hung, J.-T., Cui, C., Popescu, D. M., Chatterjee, S., & Starner, T. (2024). Socratic Mind: Scalable Oral Assessment Powered By AI. Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657604.3664661
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.