The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey of Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommender Systems
Open accessAbstract
Social recommender systems (SocialRS) simultaneously leverage the user-to-item interactions as well as the user-to-user social relations for the task of generating item recommendations to users. Additionally exploiting social relations is clearly effective in understanding users’ tastes due to the effects of homophily and social influence. For this reason, SocialRS has increasingly attracted attention. In particular, with the advance of graph neural networks (GNN), many GNN-based SocialRS methods have been developed recently. Therefore, we conduct a comprehensive and systematic review of the literature on GNN-based SocialRS. In this survey, we first identify 84 papers on GNN-based SocialRS after annotating 2,151 papers by following the PRISMA framework (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses). Then, we comprehensively review them in terms of their inputs and architectures to propose a novel taxonomy: (1) input taxonomy includes five groups of input type notations and seven groups of input representation notations; (2) architecture taxonomy includes eight groups of GNN encoder notations, two groups of decoder notations, and 12 groups of loss function notations. We classify the GNN-based SocialRS methods into several categories as per the taxonomy and describe their details. Furthermore, we summarize benchmark datasets and metrics widely used to evaluate the GNN-based SocialRS methods. Finally, we conclude this survey by presenting some future research directions. GitHub repository with the curated list of papers are available at https://github.com/claws-lab/awesome-GNN-social-recsys
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
Regret Analysis of Stochastic and Nonstochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problems
Bubeck, S., & Cesa-Bianchi, N. (2012) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000024 · Cited by 1,295
Self-supervised learning for recommender systems: A survey
Yu, J., Yin, H., Xia, X., Chen, T., Li, J., & Huang, Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2023.3282907 · Cited by 413
Cited by
Roy, F., Ding, X., Choo, K. K. R., & Zhou, P. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.12651 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharma, K., Lee, Y.-C., Nambi, S., Salian, A., Shah, S., Kim, S.-W., & Kumar, S.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 2024-06-22
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1-34
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W4396220739
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 100.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommender Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3661821
- The paper
- Sharma, K., Lee, Y.-C., Nambi, S., Salian, A., Shah, S., Kim, S.-W., & Kumar, S. (2024). A Survey of Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommender Systems. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/3661821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.