Cited by 25Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityTactile and Sensory Interactions

AltCanvas: A Tile-Based Editor for Visual Content Creation with Generative AI for Blind or Visually Impaired People

Lee, Seonghee, Kohga, Maho, Landau, Steve, O'Modhrain, Sile, Subramonyam, Hari·2024·The 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

Abstract

People with visual impairments often struggle to create content that relies heavily on visual elements, particularly when conveying spatial and structural information. Existing accessible drawing tools, which construct images line by line, are suitable for simple tasks like math but not for more expressive artwork. On the other hand, emerging generative AI-based text-to-image tools can produce expressive illustrations from descriptions in natural language, but they lack precise control over image composition and properties. To address this gap, our work integrates generative AI with a constructive approach that provides users with enhanced control and editing capabilities. Our system, AltCanvas, features a tile-based interface enabling users to construct visual scenes incrementally, with each tile representing an object within the scene. Users can add, edit, move, and arrange objects while receiving speech and audio feedback. Once completed, the scene can be rendered as a color illustration or as a vector for tactile graphic generation. Involving 14 blind or low-vision users in design and evaluation, we found that participants effectively used the AltCanvas’s workflow to create illustrations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3663548.3675600

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In research involving people with disabilities, participants mostly collaborate on the design or evaluation of access-supporting generative AI systems.

    “Similarly, in research involving PwD, participants mostly collaborate on the design or evaluation of accesssupporting generative AI systems [2, 3, 22, 60, 61, 73, 98, 109].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, S., Kohga, M., Landau, S., O'Modhrain, S., & Subramonyam, H.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Engineering, Stanford University, United States
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Touch Graphics (United States) (US)
  • University of Michigan, United States
  • Stanford University, United States
Venue
The 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-10-27
Pages
1-22
OpenAlex
W4403576922
Cited by
25
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14
FWCI
13.66
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (2229873)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
visual impairment, blind users, low vision, generative AI, text-to-image generation, tactile graphics, speech feedback, audio feedback, visual content creation, illustration design, assistive technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review