CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28Disability Rights and RepresentationDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Challenging Ableism: A Critical Turn Toward Disability Justice in HCI

Open access
Sum, Cella M., Spektor, Franchesca, Alharbi, Rahaf, Baltaxe-Admony, Leya Breanna, Devine, Erika, Dixon, Hazel Anneke, Duval, Jared, Eagle, Tessa +11 more·2024·XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students
DOI 10.1145/3665602
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A reflection on our learnings from the CHI 2022 "Dreaming Disability Justice in HCI" workshop, and why we continue to call for disability justice, despite the limitations of how we practice it within academia and industry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3665602

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a growing trend in proxy-based participation, whereby individuals familiar with a stakeholder community, including UX/HCI practitioners, often 'stand-in' for others rather than enabling communities to speak for themselves.

    “There is also a growing trend in proxy-based participation, whereby individuals familiar with a stakeholder community, including UX/HCI practitioners, often 'stand-in' for others [27, 31, 106] rather than enabling communities to speak for themselves.”

    From Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation (2026) · cites this paper as [106]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 28

Authors
Sum, C. M., Spektor, F., Alharbi, R., Baltaxe-Admony, L. B., Devine, E., Dixon, H. A., Duval, J., Eagle, T., Elavsky, F., Fernandes, K., Guedes, L. S., Hillman, S., Kameswaran, V., Kirabo, L., Motahar, T., Ringland, K. E., Schaadhardt, A., Scheepmaker, L., & Williamson, A.
ORCID
Venue
XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Published
2024-06
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
50-55
ISSN
  • 1528-4972 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-4980
DOI
10.1145/3665602
OpenAlex
W4400110016
Cited by
28
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 1
FWCI
11.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
XRDS Crossroads The ACM Magazine for Students (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
disability justice, ableism, human-computer interaction, disability studies, accessibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review