Cited by 18Innovative Human-Technology InteractionUsability and User Interface DesignInteractive and Immersive Displays

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Designing with Friction: Inverting Notions of Seamless Technology

Open access
Sheahan, Jacob, Chatting, David, Collins, Robert, Bley, Jessica, Eriksson, Alexander, Taylor, Nick, Rozendaal, Marco C.·2024·Adjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

There is growing unease and a sense within the design community of the value placed on efficient, simplified, and seamless interactions, with a growing awareness and documentation of their unintended consequences across society. By prioritizing ‘frictionless’ finance, healthcare, education products, and services, there has been a consorted effort to reduce or eliminate our daily frictions in the pursuit of efficiency and ease of use. The role of friction, however, is more nuanced than this, with a growing appreciation for designing with frictions: leveraging features usually considered problematic or exploring the benefits, barriers, and complexity beyond hindering users. In seeking a more balanced understanding of friction in systems design, this workshop will offer ways of bringing friction to the fore of design and examining its role across the domains of care, privacy, security, repairability, and autonomous vehicles. Participants will contribute to an exhibition of frictions before taking part in sessions that will unpack digital systems, identify frictions, and examine the ethical ambiguities posed by the addition or removal of friction in particular contexts. In employing the concept of friction as a critical and constructive design lens, we seek to develop further a Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) agenda for future discourse that inverts and provokes preconceptions and assumptions of a seamless digital landscape.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3677045.3685504

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.53681/c1514225187514391s.31.139 · DOI
  2. Jessica Bley 2023. Design friction in autonomous drive—exploring transitions between autonomous and manual drive in non-urgent situations. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-023-01780-7. · DOI
  3. Matthew Chalmers 2003. Seamful Design: Showing The Seams In Wearable Computing. (2003). · DOI
  4. 10.1145/3580299 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/10630732.2014.971525 · DOI
  6. 10.1145/2470654.2466472 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/3294109.3300999 · DOI
  8. 10.1145/3491102.3517558 · DOI
  9. Vladan Joler. 2023. Black Box Cartography – A critical cartography of the Internet and beyond. Krisis publishing.
  10. 10.1145/3526113.3545658 · DOI
  11. Joan C. Tronto. 2015. Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
  12. 10.1515/9781400830596 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1145/3512912 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Sheahan, J., Chatting, D., Collins, R., Bley, J., Eriksson, A., Taylor, N., & Rozendaal, M. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Volvo (Sweden) (SE)
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
Venue
Adjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-10-13
Pages
1-4
OpenAlex
W4402967824
Cited by
18
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 4
FWCI
5.80
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
Keywords
friction, design for care, privacy, security (computing), repairability, autonomous vehicles, moral ambiguity, digital systems, human-computer interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review