Exploring Blind and Low-Vision Youth’s Digital Access Needs in School: Toward Accessible Instructional Technologies
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Blind and low-vision (BLV) youth have been excluded from technology-mediated learning in school for two decades due to the systemic inaccessibility of K-12 instructional technologies. Accessibility guidelines that address BLV youth’s needs would help schools address this systemic inequity. But such guidelines do not yet exist nor does the robust knowledgebase required to write them. Herein, I report three key findings from a mixed methods user study of BLV youth’s lived experiences learning with access technologies (AT) and instructional technologies in US schools. First, these youth participants are using a broader range of AT than youth in previous studies. Second, the youth in this study frequently developed their AT literacy outside of school, and most did not begin developing AT literacy in earnest until they were teens. Third, the youth defined accessible instructional technologies as those that are (1) easy to learn to use and (2) easy to use to learn and they used an inquiry process to evaluate accessibility. Building on the findings, I offer six preliminary design guidelines for accessible instructional technologies. Finally, I urge other scholars to study BLV youth’s digital access needs so that standards setting bodies eventually have sufficient data to write youth accessibility guidelines.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students have unique experiences with AT compared to adult expert AT users.
“as students have unique experiences with AT compared to adult expert AT users [42].”
From Where are the Disabled Students?: A Literature Review of Disability Inclusion in Computing Education Research (2026) · cites this paper as [42]
Cites
Transformative Paradigm: Mixed Methods and Social Justice
Mertens, D. M. (2007) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689807302811 · Cited by 860 · cited 2× · see citing works
““Transformative mixed methodologies provide a mechanism for addressing the complexities of research in culturally complex settings that can provide a basis for social change” [Mertens, 2007, p. 212].”
Interaction Design and Children
Hourcade, J. P. (2008) · Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1561/1100000006 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Computer Science Principles for Teachers of Blind and Visually Impaired Students
Stefik, A., Ladner, R. E., Allee, W., & Mealin, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3287324.3287453 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Figueira, I., Cisneros, J. M., Weber, J. L., Sanka, W., Phan, K., Wong-Ma, J., & Branham, S. M. (2026) · Proceedings of the 57th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V.1 · doi:10.1145/3770762.3772561 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shaheen, N. L.
- Affiliations
- Illinois State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shaheen, Natalie L.
- ORCID
- Shaheen, Natalie L.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
- Published
- 2024-09-30
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-31
- ISSN
- 1936-7228 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-7236
- OpenAlex
- W4401580356
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- ISU Red - Research and eData (Illinois State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Keywords
- accessibility guidelines, K-12 education, technology-mediated learning, accessibility standards
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review