Cited by 5Software-Defined Networks and 5GExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Mobile Agent-Based Network Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Localized Explanations for Automatically Synthesized Network Configurations

Open access
Nazari, Amirmohammad, Zhang, Yongzheng, Raghothaman, Mukund, Chen, Haoxian·2024·Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks

Abstract

Network synthesis simplifies network management by automatically generating distributed configurations that fulfill high-level intents. However, typical network synthesizers operate as monolithic algorithms, obscuring the internal workings of the synthesis process and showing no clear connection between the generated configurations and the global intents. Given the critical role of networks as infrastructure, it is crucial for network operators to understand the synthesized configurations to establish trust in these automatic tools. To address this challenge, we propose using subspecifications localized to each component in the network topology to enhance the interpretability of network synthesis. These subspecifications provide insights into the workings of synthesizers by connecting each component's functionalities with the global configuration intents.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3696348.3696888

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1145/3386367.3431304 · DOI
  2. Anubhavnidhi Abhashkumar, Aaron Gember-Jacobson, and Aditya Akella. 2020. Tiramisu: Fast multilayer network verification. In 17th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 20). 201--219.
  3. Timothy Alberdingk Thijm, Ryan Beckett, Aarti Gupta, and David Walker. 2023. Modular control plane verification via temporal invariants. Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages 7, PLDI (2023), 50--75.
  4. 10.1145/3098822.3098834 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1145/2934872.2934909 · DOI
  6. 10.1145/3062341.3062367 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Rüdiger Birkner, Tobias Brodmann, Petar Tsankov, Laurent Vanbever, and Martin Vechev. 2021. Metha: Network verifiers need to be correct too!. In 18th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 21). 99--113.
  8. Rüdiger Birkner, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Laurent Vanbever, and Martin Vechev. 2020. {Config2Spec}: Mining network specifications from network configurations. In 17th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 20). 969--984.
  9. 10.1145/3603269.3604866 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1145/2934872.2934910 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/978-3-642-35873-9_10 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/978-3-319-63390-9_14 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ahmed El-Hassany, Petar Tsankov, Laurent Vanbever, and Martin Vechev. 2018. {NetComplete}: Practical {Network-Wide} configuration synthesis with autocompletion. In 15th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 18). 579--594.
  14. Ari Fogel, Stanley Fung, Luis Pedrosa, Meg Walraed-Sullivan, Ramesh Govindan, Ratul Mahajan, and Todd Millstein. 2015. A general approach to network configuration analysis. In 12th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 15). 469--483.
  15. 10.1145/1081706.1081713 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1145/3373360.3380831 · DOI
  17. 10.1145/3545945.3569785 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1145/3626111.3628194 · DOI
  19. 10.1145/3622874 · DOI
  20. Lauren Pick. 2022. Scaling Automatic Modular Verification. Princeton University.
  21. Sivaramakrishnan Ramanathan, Ying Zhang, Mohab Gawish, Yogesh Mundada, Zhaodong Wang, Sangki Yun, Eric Lippert, Walid Taha, Minlan Yu, and Jelena Mirkovic. 2023. Practical intent-driven routing configuration synthesis. In 20th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 23). 629--644.
  22. 10.1145/3501385.3543957 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1145/3603269.3604842 · DOI
  24. 10.1145/3387514.3406217 · DOI
  25. 10.1145/3544216.3544264 · DOI
  26. 10.1145/3411764.3445646 · DOI
  27. 10.1145/2043556.2043584 · DOI
  28. 10.1145/1807167.1807234 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nazari, A., Zhang, Y., Raghothaman, M., & Chen, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • ShanghaiTech University (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-11-18
Pages
52-59
OpenAlex
W4404239633
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
2.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
NSF (National Science Foundation) (CCF #2124431 CCF #2107261, CCF #2146518)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Mobile Agent-Based Network Management
Keywords
network synthesis, explainable AI, interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review