The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Automatic Configuration Repair
Abstract
Networks are error-prone due to misconfigurations, and it is hard to identify the root causes in the configuration and find a repair due to the size and complexity of networks running distributed routing protocols. Thus, we advocate Automatic Configuration Repair (ACR) to reduce the manual effort. Specifically, we draw some insights from the field of Automatic Software Repair (ASR), crystallize some lessons learned from the real-world repair experience of a large service provider, and propose some directions to realize ACR. Inspired by the generate-and-validate approach from ASR, we propose localize-fix-validate as a possible approach to realize ACR.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“At the same time, NetOps has a higher safety bar than many AIOps settings because a single incorrect change can propagate quickly, trigger large blast-radius outages, or create hard-to-debug transient behaviours during convergence [47], [11], [108], [109].”
From Large language models for agentic NetOps and AIOps: Architectures, evaluation, and safety (2027) · cites this paper as [108]
In the citing paper
“Although these causes may appear simple, they are difficult to predict without systematic testing [108], [109], [34], [45], [65].”
From Large language models for agentic NetOps and AIOps: Architectures, evaluation, and safety (2027) · cites this paper as [108]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.1145/3386367.3431304 · DOI
- 10.5555/1308173.1308264 · DOI
- 10.1145/2659118.2659125 · DOI
- 10.1145/1831708.1831715 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSE.2010.31 · DOI
- 10.1145/2635868.2635898 · DOI
- 10.1145/2934872.2934910 · DOI
- 10.1109/DSN.2002.1029005 · DOI
- 10.5555/3026877.3026895 · DOI
- Ari Fogel, Stanley Fung, Luis Pedrosa, Meg Walraed-Sullivan, Ramesh Govindan, Ratul Mahajan, and Todd Millstein. 2015. A general approach to network configuration analysis. In 12th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 15). 469--483.
- Zhaoyu Gao, Anubhavnidhi Abhashkumar, Zhen Sun, Weirong Jiang, and Yi Wang. 2024. Crescent: Emulating Heterogeneous Production Network at Scale. In 21st USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 24). 1045--1062.
- 10.1145/3180155.3182526 · DOI
- 10.1145/3132747.3132753 · DOI
- 10.1145/3152434.3152439 · DOI · Paper page
- Aaron Gember-Jacobson, Ruchit Shrestha, and Xiaolin Sun. 2022. Localizing router configuration errors using minimal correction sets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.10785 (2022). · arXiv
- 10.1145/1101908.1101949 · DOI
- Claire Le Goues, ThanhVu Nguyen, Stephanie Forrest, and Westley Weimer. 2011. Genprog: A generic method for automatic software repair. Ieee transactions on software engineering 38, 1 (2011), 54--72.
- 10.1109/ICST.2013.24 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSE.2015.63 · DOI
- 10.1145/3105906 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606623 · DOI
- 10.1145/1831708.1831716 · DOI
- 10.1109/ASE.2013.6693094 · DOI
- Yang Wu, Ang Chen, Andreas Haeberlen, Wenchao Zhou, and Boon Thau Loo. 2017. Automated Bug Removal for {Software-Defined} Networks. In 14th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 17). 719--733.
- 10.1145/2740070.2626335 · DOI
- Xieyang Xu, Weixin Deng, Ryan Beckett, Ratul Mahajan, and David Walker. 2023. Test Coverage for Network Configurations. In 20th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 23). 1717--1732.
- 10.1145/3387514.3406217 · DOI
- Peng Zhang, Aaron Gember-Jacobson, Yueshang Zuo, Yuhao Huang, Xu Liu, and Hao Li. 2022. Differential network analysis. In 19th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 22). 601--615.
- Peng Zhang, Xu Liu, Hongkun Yang, Ning Kang, Zhengchang Gu, and Hao Li. 2020. {APKeep}: Realtime Verification for Real Networks. In 17th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 20). 241--255.
- 10.1145/3544216.3544264 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large language models for agentic NetOps and AIOps: Architectures, evaluation, and safety
Bilal, M., Crowcroft, J., Wang, R., Xu, X., & Dustdar, S. (2027) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2026.101075 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, X., Zhang, P., Abhashkumar, A., Chen, J., & Jiang, W.
- Affiliations
- Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
- ByteDance (China) (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2024-11-18
- Pages
- 213-220
- OpenAlex
- W4404240614
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NSFC (62272382)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
- Keywords
- network misconfiguration, distributed routing protocol, root cause identification, service provider networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic Configuration Repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3696348.3696895
- The paper
- Liu, X., Zhang, P., Abhashkumar, A., Chen, J., & Jiang, W. (2024). Automatic Configuration Repair. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. https://doi.org/10.1145/3696348.3696895