Cited by 43Software Engineering ResearchSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesTopic Modeling

Efficient and Green Large Language Models for Software Engineering: Literature Review, Vision, and the Road Ahead

Open access
Shi, Jieke, Yang, Zhou, Lo, David·2025·ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently shown remarkable capabilities in various software engineering tasks, spurring the rapid growth of the Large Language Models for Software Engineering (LLM4SE) area. However, limited attention has been paid to developing efficient LLM4SE techniques that demand minimal computational cost, time, and memory resources, as well as green LLM4SE solutions that reduce energy consumption, water usage, and carbon emissions. This article aims to redirect the focus of the research community toward the efficiency and greenness of LLM4SE, while also sharing potential research directions to achieve this goal. It commences with a brief overview of the significance of LLM4SE and highlights the need for efficient and green LLM4SE solutions. Subsequently, the article presents a vision for a future where efficient and green LLM4SE revolutionizes the LLM-based software engineering tool landscape, benefiting various stakeholders, including industry, individual practitioners, and society. The article then delineates a roadmap for future research, outlining specific research paths and potential solutions for the research community to pursue. While not intended to be a definitive guide, the article aims to inspire further progress, with the ultimate goal of establishing efficient and green LLM4SE as a central element in the future of software engineering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3708525

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using the 4P creativity framework and the tetrad does not directly encourage consideration of the ethical, legal, and sustainability issues increasingly associated with GenAI.

    “Secondly, using the 4P creativity framework and the tetrad with its focus on how a technology can enhance, obsolesce, retrieve, and reverse into phenomena does not directly encourage consideration of the ethical, legal, and sustainability issues increasingly associated with GenAI (e.g., [10, 100, 106, 120]).”
  • GenAI requires huge amounts of environmental resources leading to depletion of the natural environment, which clearly impacts society negatively for all GenAI use.

    “GenAI requires huge amounts of environmental resources leading to depletion of the natural environment [120], which clearly impacts society negatively for all GenAI use, including the subject of this article—creativity in software development.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 99 · Cited by 43

Authors
Shi, J., Yang, Z., & Lo, D.
Affiliations
Singapore Management University (SG)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
Published
2025-05-24
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
1-22
ISSN
  • 1049-331X (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7392
OpenAlex
W4405640497
Cited by
43
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 3
FWCI
16.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
National Research Foundation (NRF-NRFI08-2022-0002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
large language models, green computing, energy consumption, CO2 emissions, resource efficiency, future research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review