Efficient and Green Large Language Models for Software Engineering: Literature Review, Vision, and the Road Ahead
Open accessAbstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently shown remarkable capabilities in various software engineering tasks, spurring the rapid growth of the Large Language Models for Software Engineering (LLM4SE) area. However, limited attention has been paid to developing efficient LLM4SE techniques that demand minimal computational cost, time, and memory resources, as well as green LLM4SE solutions that reduce energy consumption, water usage, and carbon emissions. This article aims to redirect the focus of the research community toward the efficiency and greenness of LLM4SE, while also sharing potential research directions to achieve this goal. It commences with a brief overview of the significance of LLM4SE and highlights the need for efficient and green LLM4SE solutions. Subsequently, the article presents a vision for a future where efficient and green LLM4SE revolutionizes the LLM-based software engineering tool landscape, benefiting various stakeholders, including industry, individual practitioners, and society. The article then delineates a roadmap for future research, outlining specific research paths and potential solutions for the research community to pursue. While not intended to be a definitive guide, the article aims to inspire further progress, with the ultimate goal of establishing efficient and green LLM4SE as a central element in the future of software engineering.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using the 4P creativity framework and the tetrad does not directly encourage consideration of the ethical, legal, and sustainability issues increasingly associated with GenAI.
“Secondly, using the 4P creativity framework and the tetrad with its focus on how a technology can enhance, obsolesce, retrieve, and reverse into phenomena does not directly encourage consideration of the ethical, legal, and sustainability issues increasingly associated with GenAI (e.g., [10, 100, 106, 120]).”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity in Software Development: A Research Agenda (2025) · cites this paper as [120]
GenAI requires huge amounts of environmental resources leading to depletion of the natural environment, which clearly impacts society negatively for all GenAI use.
“GenAI requires huge amounts of environmental resources leading to depletion of the natural environment [120], which clearly impacts society negatively for all GenAI use, including the subject of this article—creativity in software development.”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity in Software Development: A Research Agenda (2025) · cites this paper as [120]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 99 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Shi, J., Yang, Z., & Lo, D.
- Affiliations
- Singapore Management University (SG)
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
- Published
- 2025-05-24
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 1049-331X (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7392
- OpenAlex
- W4405640497
- Semantic Scholar
- ac05c44af8ea1157b34e1145170de97261825e4a
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 99
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 16.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation (NRF-NRFI08-2022-0002)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- large language models, green computing, energy consumption, CO2 emissions, resource efficiency, future research directions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review