Information Retrieval for Artificial General Intelligence: A New Perspective of Information Retrieval Research
Open accessAbstract
Traditionally, the users of an information retrieval (IR) system have been human users. We present a new perspective on IR research in which the users of an IR system are intelligent agents instead of human users. Extending the current work on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), we identify five novel IR tasks that an intelligent agent must be able to perform in order to achieve Human-Level Artificial Intelligence, or Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), including 1) External Information Retrieval (EIR) to access new information unseen by the agent, 2) Provenance Information Retrieval (PIR) to trace the provenance of information, 3) Curriculum Information Retrieval (CIR) to actively acquire the most useful new data and information for lifelong learning, 4) Rule Information Retrieval (RIR) to perform reasoning and problem solving, and 5) Scenario Information Retrieval (SIR) to leverage past scenarios for problem solving and decision making. We compare these new IR tasks with the traditional IR tasks performed by an IR system that serves human users and systematically examine the challenges involved in the five new IR tasks, providing a roadmap for new IR research within the broader context of AGI development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Zhai categorizes what an intelligent agent needs to retrieve from a complementary angle, distinguishing external information the agent has not seen, the provenance of information, training data for continual learning, rules for reasoning, and past scenarios for problem solving.
“Zhai [75] categorizes what an intelligent agent needs to retrieve from a complementary angle, distinguishing external information the agent has not seen, the provenance of information, training data for continual learning, rules for reasoning, and past scenarios for problem solving.”
From Agentic Memory Management Is the Next Frontier of Information Retrieval (2026) · cites this paper as [75]
Cites
Benchmarking Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Chen, J., Lin, H., Han, X., & Sun, L. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29728 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Tool Learning with Foundation Models
Qin, Y., Hu, S., Lin, Y., Chen, W., Ding, N., Cui, G., Zeng, Z., Huang, Y., Xiao, C., Han, C., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.08354 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Zhai, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhai, ChengXiang
- ORCID
- Zhai, ChengXiang
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2025-07-13
- Pages
- 3876-3886
- OpenAlex
- W4412377991
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2229612)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Keywords
- information retrieval, artificial general intelligence, AI agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review