Cited by 3Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorTopic ModelingRecommender Systems and Techniques

Information Retrieval for Artificial General Intelligence: A New Perspective of Information Retrieval Research

Open access
Zhai, ChengXiang·2025·Proceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Abstract

Traditionally, the users of an information retrieval (IR) system have been human users. We present a new perspective on IR research in which the users of an IR system are intelligent agents instead of human users. Extending the current work on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), we identify five novel IR tasks that an intelligent agent must be able to perform in order to achieve Human-Level Artificial Intelligence, or Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), including 1) External Information Retrieval (EIR) to access new information unseen by the agent, 2) Provenance Information Retrieval (PIR) to trace the provenance of information, 3) Curriculum Information Retrieval (CIR) to actively acquire the most useful new data and information for lifelong learning, 4) Rule Information Retrieval (RIR) to perform reasoning and problem solving, and 5) Scenario Information Retrieval (SIR) to leverage past scenarios for problem solving and decision making. We compare these new IR tasks with the traditional IR tasks performed by an IR system that serves human users and systematically examine the challenges involved in the five new IR tasks, providing a roadmap for new IR research within the broader context of AGI development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3726302.3730349

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zhai categorizes what an intelligent agent needs to retrieve from a complementary angle, distinguishing external information the agent has not seen, the provenance of information, training data for continual learning, rules for reasoning, and past scenarios for problem solving.

    “Zhai [75] categorizes what an intelligent agent needs to retrieve from a complementary angle, distinguishing external information the agent has not seen, the provenance of information, training data for continual learning, rules for reasoning, and past scenarios for problem solving.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhai, C.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Zhai, ChengXiang
Venue
Proceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM
Published
2025-07-13
Pages
3876-3886
OpenAlex
W4412377991
Cited by
3
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
2.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation (2229612)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
information retrieval, artificial general intelligence, AI agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review