The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AltGen: AI-Driven Alt Text Generation for Enhancing EPUB Accessibility
Open accessAbstract
Digital accessibility is a cornerstone of inclusive content delivery, yet many EPUB files fail to meet fundamental accessibility standards, particularly in providing descriptive alt text for images. Alt text plays a critical role in enabling visually impaired users to understand visual content through assistive technologies. However, generating high-quality alt text at scale is a resource-intensive process, creating significant challenges for organizations aiming to ensure accessibility compliance. This paper introduces AltGen, a novel AI-driven pipeline designed to automate the generation of alt text for images in EPUB files. By integrating state-of-the-art generative models, including advanced transformer-based architectures, AltGen achieves contextually relevant and linguistically coherent alt text descriptions. The pipeline encompasses multiple stages, starting with data preprocessing to extract and prepare relevant content, followed by visual analysis using computer vision models such as CLIP and ViT. The extracted visual features are enriched with contextual information from surrounding text, enabling the fine-tuned language models to generate descriptive and accurate alt text. Validation of the generated output employs both quantitative metrics, such as cosine similarity and BLEU scores, and qualitative feedback from visually impaired users. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of AltGen across diverse datasets, achieving a 97.5% reduction in accessibility errors and high scores in similarity and linguistic fidelity metrics. User studies highlight the practical impact of AltGen, with participants reporting significant improvements in document usability and comprehension. Furthermore, comparative analyses reveal that AltGen outperforms existing approaches in terms of accuracy, relevance, and scalability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“when generative AI tools are given explicit, operationalized accessibility instructions, through carefully engineered prompts [15,16], structured remediation pipelines [17,18], or context-aware generation conditioned on the surrounding material [19], measured compliance improves substantially compared to unconfigured use of the same tool.”
From A Protocol for Evaluating the Accessibility of AI-Generated Educational Materials: Prompt Configuration, WCAG-Derived Criteria, and Content Overload (2026) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The improvement observed under Condition B (Section 4.1) would extend, to educational content specifically, findings already reported for web code [15,16], PDF tagging [18], and alt-text generation [17,19] individually.”
From A Protocol for Evaluating the Accessibility of AI-Generated Educational Materials: Prompt Configuration, WCAG-Derived Criteria, and Content Overload (2026) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Learning for Image Captioning
Hossain, M. Z., Sohel, F., Shiratuddin, M. F., & Laga, H. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3295748 · Cited by 879 · cited 1×
“Semantically rich textual descriptions from visual inputs can be developed by means of transformer-based architectures s [11, 13, 22] which have shown strong performance in natural language processing and computer vision.”
Elkhatat, A. M., Elsaid, K., & Almeer, S. (2023) · International Journal for Educational Integrity · doi:10.1007/s40979-023-00140-5 · Cited by 392
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Josh Achiam Steven Adler Sandhini Agarwal Lama Ahmad Ilge Akkaya Florencia Leoni Aleman Diogo Almeida Janko Altenschmidt Sam Altman Shyamal Anadkat et al. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:https://arXiv.org/abs/2303.08774 (2023). · arXiv
- Asli Celikyilmaz Elizabeth Clark and Jianfeng Gao. 2020. Evaluation of text generation: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:https://arXiv.org/abs/2006.14799 (2020). · arXiv
- Michael Chee and Kari D Weaver. 2021. Meeting a higher standard: A case study of accessibility compliance in LibGuides upon the adoption of WCAG 2.0 guidelines. Journal of Web Librarianship 15 2 (2021) 69–89. 10.1080/19322909.2021.1907267 · DOI
- Zhanyi Ding Zhongyan Wang Yeyubei Zhang Yuchen Cao Yunchong Liu Xiaorui Shen Yexin Tian and Jianglai Dai. 2025. Efficient or powerful? trade-offs between machine learning and deep learning for mental illness detection on social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:https://arXiv.org/abs/2503.01082 (2025). · DOI
- Alexey Dosovitskiy. 2020. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:https://arXiv.org/abs/2010.11929 (2020). · arXiv
- Emory J Edwards Michael Gilbert Emily Blank and Stacy M Branham. 2023. How the Alt Text Gets Made: What Roles and Processes of Alt Text Creation Can Teach Us About Inclusive Imagery. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 16 2 (2023) 1–28. · DOI
- Trude Eikebrokk Tor Arne Dahl and Siri Kessel. 2014. EPUB as Publication format in open access journals: tools and workflow. (2014). https://doi.org/10642/2022
- 10.1145/3461702.3462620 · DOI · Paper page
- Mukta Kulkarni. 2019. Digital accessibility: Challenges and opportunities. IIMB Management Review 31 1 (2019) 91–98. 10.1016/j.iimb.2018.05.009 · DOI
- Hugo Laurençon Lucile Saulnier Léo Tronchon Stas Bekman Amanpreet Singh Anton Lozhkov Thomas Wang Siddharth Karamcheti Alexander Rush Douwe Kiela et al. 2024. Obelics: An open web-scale filtered dataset of interleaved image-text documents. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2024).
- Keqin Li Jin Wang Xubo Wu Xirui Peng Runmian Chang Xiaoyu Deng Yiwen Kang Yue Yang Fanghao Ni and Bo Hong. 2024. Optimizing automated picking systems in warehouse robots using machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:https://arXiv.org/abs/2408.16633 (2024). · arXiv
- 10.1109/CVPRW63382.2024.00637 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICDAR.2011.102 · DOI
- Surjit Paul. 2023. Accessibility analysis using WCAG 2.1: evidence from Indian e-government websites. Universal access in the information society 22 2 (2023) 663–669. 10.1007/s10209-021-00861-9 · DOI
- Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. 2021. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 8748–8763.
- Yixian Shen Qi Bi Jia-Hong Huang Hongyi Zhu Andy D Pimentel and Anuj Pathania. 2025. SSH: Sparse Spectrum Adaptation via Discrete Hartley Transformation. arXiv preprint arXiv:https://arXiv.org/abs/2502.05539 (2025). · DOI
- 10.23919/DATE56975.2023.10136895 · DOI
- 10.1109/AUTEEE62881.2024.10869734 · DOI
- A Vaswani. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2017).
- Steven J Vaughan-Nichols. 2010. Will HTML 5 restandardize the web? Computer 43 4 (2010) 13–15. 10.1109/MC.2010.119 · DOI
- 10.1145/2998181.2998364 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01474 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Amado-Salvatierra, H. R. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.00749
“The improvement observed under Condition B (Section 4.1) would extend, to educational content specifically, findings already reported for web code [15,16], PDF tagging [18], and alt-text generation [17,19] individually.”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, Y., Zhang, H., Shen, Y., Wang, L., Shi, C., Du, S., & Tao, Y.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Duke University (US)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computational Intelligence
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2025-02-14
- Pages
- 78-83
- OpenAlex
- W4412438704
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 22.07
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Text Readability and Simplification
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- EPUB, digital accessibility, assistive technology, AI-generated text, e-book accessibility, screen readers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AltGen: AI-Driven Alt Text Generation for Enhancing EPUB Accessibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3730436.3730449
- The paper
- Shen, Y., Zhang, H., Shen, Y., Wang, L., Shi, C., Du, S., & Tao, Y. (2025). AltGen: AI-Driven Alt Text Generation for Enhancing EPUB Accessibility. Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computational Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1145/3730436.3730449