The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Bridging Data Gaps: Harnessing Semantic Associations for Knowledge Discovery in Colonial Heritage
Abstract
Cultural heritage data, particularly from colonial contexts, frequently presents an incomplete and biased view, reflecting historical institutional priorities more than contemporary knowledge requirements. Consequently, knowledge graphs derived from these records often contain incomplete, fragmented, and skewed data, including absent attributes or values, missing semantic links, and under-represented perspectives. This work addresses the challenge of knowledge discovery under such limitations, presenting a real-world case study on the provenance research of colonial cultural heritage. We present a task-aware design method for building a tool to facilitate this process. The design approach of this application is rooted in a Knowledge Discovery in Database (KDD) framework and is particularly novel due to its formalisation and operationalisation of three distinct types of semantic association: explicit, abstract, and implicit. These semantic associations, grounded in domain interpretation, are crucial for bridging data gaps where user information needs cannot be directly met by existing data. We further demonstrate how these associations can be effectively communicated through user interface components, enabling users to infer new knowledge. We evaluated the resultant application through a user study among domain experts to assess its efficacy. The evaluation confirms the effectiveness of the tool in enabling new knowledge discovery and reveals opportunities to improve the representation of the underlying data, as users could successfully infer insights even when information was missing or poorly captured in the original data sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- Peter Afflerbach. 2001. Verbal reports and protocol analysis. In Methods of literacy research. Routledge, London, 97–114.
- Annastiina Ahola Telma Peura and Eero Hyvönen. 2025. Using Linked Data for Data Analytic Literary Research: Case BookSampo – Finnish Fiction Literature on the Semantic Web. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) 76 7 (2025) 937–958. 10.1002/asi.24984 · DOI
- Mehwish Alam Aleksey Buzmakov and Amedeo Napoli. 2018. Exploratory knowledge discovery over Web of Data. Discrete Applied Mathematics 249 (2018) 2–17. 10.1016/j.dam.2018.03.041 · DOI
- Aba-Sah Dadzie and Emmanuel Pietriga. 2016. Visualisation of Linked Data – Reprise. Semantic Web 8 1 (2016) 1–21. 10.3233/SW-160249 arXiv:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3233/SW-160249 · DOI
- 10.1145/2462197.2462199 · DOI
- 10.1007/354063514930 · DOI
- Usama Fayyad, Gregory Piatetsky-Shapiro, and Padhraic Smyth. 1996. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: Towards a Unifying Framework. In KDD-96 Proceedings.
- Dhouha Grissa Blandine Comte Mélanie Pétéra Estelle Pujos-Guillot and Amedeo Napoli. 2020. A hybrid and exploratory approach to knowledge discovery in metabolomic data. Discrete Applied Mathematics 273 (2020) 103–116. 10.1016/j.dam.2018.11.025Advances in Formal Concept Analysis: Traces of CLA 2016. · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-30284-8_8 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-13486-9_20 · DOI
- Eero Hyvönen. 2022. Digital Humanities on the Semantic Web: Sampo Model and Portal Series. Semantic Web 14 4 (2022) 729–744. 10.3233/SW-223034 · DOI
- Eero Hyvönen. 2025. Serendipitous knowledge discovery on the Web of Wisdom based on searching and explaining interesting relations in knowledge graphs. Journal of Web Semantics 85 (2025) 100852. 10.1016/j.websem.2024.100852 · DOI
- Eero Hyvönen Laura Sinikallio Petri Leskinen Senka Drobac Rafael Leal Matti La Mela Jouni Tuominen Henna Poikkimäki and Heikki Rantala. 2025. Publishing and Using Parliamentary Linked Data on the Semantic Web: ParliamentSampo System for Parliament of Finland. Semantic Web 16 1 (2025). 10.3233/SW-243683 · DOI
- Esko Ikkala Eero Hyvönen Heikki Rantala and Mikko Koho. 2022. Sampo-UI: A Full Stack JavaScript Framework for Developing Semantic Portal User Interfaces. Semantic Web 13 1 (2022) 69–84. 10.3233/SW-210428 · DOI
- 10.1145/3148011.3148037 · DOI
- Lynn J. Lohnas. 2025. A Retrieved Context Model of Serial Recall and Free Recall. Computational Brain & Behavior 8 1 (March 2025) 1–35. 10.1007/s42113-024-00221-9 · DOI
- Heikki Rantala, Annastiina Ahola, Esko Ikkala, and Eero Hyvönen. 2023. How to create easily a data analytic semantic portal on top of a SPARQL endpoint: introducing the configurable Sampo-UI framework. In Proceedings of 8th International Workshop on the Visualization and Interaction for Ontologies and Linked Data, Athens, Greece. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3508, Athens, Greece. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3508/paper3.pdf
- 10.4135/9781412963909.n176 · DOI
- Felwine Sarr and Bénédicte Savoy. 2018. The Restitution of African Cultural Heritage. Ministère de la Culture.
- Sarah Binta Alam Shoilee, Annastiina Ahola, Heikki Rantala, Eero Hyvönen, Victor de Boer, Jacco van Ossenbruggen, and Susan Legene. 2025. Enhancing Provenance Research with Linked Data: A Visual Approach to Knowledge Discovery. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop of Semantic Digital Humanities (SemDH 2025) co-located with the Extended Semantic Web Conference 2025 (ESWC 2025). Portoroz, Slovenia, June 02, 2025(CEUR Workshop Proceedings). CEUR-WS.org, Aachen, Germany.
- 10.1007/978-3-031-99554-5_29 · DOI
- 10.3233/SSW230010 · DOI
- Abraham Silberschatz and Alexander Tuzhilin. 1995. On subjective measures of interestingness in knowledge discovery.. In KDD, Vol. 95. 275–281.
- Arthur Tompkins. 2021. Provenance Research Today. Lund Humphries.
- J. W. Tukey. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. Pearson.
- 10.5555/1855087 · doi:10.5555/1855087
- 10.59962/9780774863940 · DOI
- Guillermo Vega-Gorgojo. 2024. LOD4Culture: Easy exploration of cultural heritage linked open data. Semantic Web 15 5 (2024) 1563–1592. 10.3233/SW-233358 arXiv:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3233/SW-233358 · DOI
- Jörg Waitelonis and Harald Sack. 2009. Towards Exploratory Video Search Using Linked Data. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Data Semantics for Multimedia System and Applications (DSMSA2009) in conjunction with IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM2009) (Dec. 2009) 540–545. · DOI
- Dawid Wiśniewski Jedrzej Potoniec Agnieszka Ławrynowicz and C. Maria Keet. 2019. Analysis of Ontology Competency Questions and their formalizations in SPARQL-OWL. Web Semant. 59 C (dec 2019) 19 pages. 10.1016/j.websem.2019.100534 · DOI
- Liyang Yu and Liyang Yu. 2011. Follow your nose: a basic semantic web agent. A Developer’s Guide to the Semantic Web (2011) 533–557. · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Shoilee, S. B. A., de Boer, V., Ahola, A., Rantala, H., Hyvönen, E., van Ossenbruggen, J., & Legêne, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Knowledge Capture Conference 2025
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2025-12-10
- Pages
- 35-43
- Cited by
- 0
- Funders
- Dutch Research Agenda (NWA) (NWA.1292.19.419)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bridging Data Gaps: Harnessing Semantic Associations for Knowledge Discovery in Colonial Heritage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3731443.3771345
- The paper
- Shoilee, S. B. A., de Boer, V., Ahola, A., Rantala, H., Hyvönen, E., van Ossenbruggen, J., & Legêne, S. (2025). Bridging Data Gaps: Harnessing Semantic Associations for Knowledge Discovery in Colonial Heritage. Proceedings of the Knowledge Capture Conference 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3731443.3771345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.