Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

WikiConflict: A New Dataset for Conflicting Data Reconciliation in Knowledge Graph Construction

Jarnac, Lucas, Chabot, Yoan, Couceiro, Miguel·2025·Proceedings of the Knowledge Capture Conference 2025

Abstract

The construction of a knowledge graph (KG) can be performed manually. Nevertheless, ensuring minimal coverage of a KG often requires the automatic data extraction from multiple sources. However, sources and extraction algorithms often vary in quality, may provide conflicting data with different levels of specificity or even contradict each other for the same entity. To reconcile these conflicting data and integrate them consistently within the KG, numerous fusion models can be adopted that simultaneously evaluate both the quality of the sources and the data provided. However, most of these models are usually evaluated on datasets that do not specifically represent differences in specificity, the heterogeneity of data types, or the presence of long-tail entities. These three challenges are frequently encountered in KG construction, making the data fusion process more complex. In this paper, we propose to overcome these limitations by introducing WikiConflict, a dataset built from the Wikidata revision history and designed for KG construction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3731443.3771371

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 1

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Aidan Hogan et al.2021. Knowledge Graphs. Number 22 in Synthesis Lectures on Data, Semantics, and Knowledge. Springer.
  2. Bo Zhao et al.2012. A Bayesian Approach to Discovering Truth from Conflicting Sources for Data Integration. Proc. VLDB Endow. 5 6 (2012) 550–561. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Denny Vrandecic et al.2014. Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM 57 10 (2014) 78–85. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz et al.2020. SemTab 2019: Resources to Benchmark Tabular Data to Knowledge Graph Matching Systems. In The Semantic Web - 17th International Conference, ESWC 2020, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 31-June 4, 2020, Proceedings(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 12123), Andreas Harth, Sabrina Kirrane, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo, Heiko Paulheim, Anisa Rula, Anna Lisa Gentile, Peter Haase, and Michael Cochez (Eds.). Springer, 514–530. · DOI
  5. Hichem Ammar Khodja et al.2024. WikiFactDiff: A Large, Realistic, and Temporally Adaptable Dataset for Atomic Factual Knowledge Update in Causal Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC/COLING 2024, 20-25 May, 2024, Torino, Italy, Nicoletta Calzolari, Min-Yen Kan, Véronique Hoste, Alessandro Lenci, Sakriani Sakti, and Nianwen Xue (Eds.). ELRA and ICCL, 17614–17624.
  6. Lucas Jarnac et al.2025. Uncertainty Management in the Construction of Knowledge Graphs: A Survey. TGDK 3 1 (2025) 3:1–3:48. 10.4230/TGDK.3.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Lukas Schmelzeisen et al.2021. Wikidated 1.0: An Evolving Knowledge Graph Dataset of Wikidata’s Revision History. In Proceedings of the 2nd Wikidata Workshop (Wikidata 2021) co-located with the 20th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2021), Virtual Conference, October 24, 2021(CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2982), Lucie-Aimée Kaffee, Simon Razniewski, and Aidan Hogan (Eds.). CEUR-WS.org.
  8. Qi Li et al.2014. Resolving conflicts in heterogeneous data by truth discovery and source reliability estimation. In International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD 2014, Snowbird, UT, USA, June 22-27, 2014. ACM, 1187–1198.
  9. Stefan Heindorf et al.2015. Towards Vandalism Detection in Knowledge Bases: Corpus Construction and Analysis. In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Santiago, Chile, August 9-13, 2015, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Mounia Lalmas, Alistair Moffat, and Berthier A. Ribeiro-Neto (Eds.). ACM, 831–834.
  10. Stefan Heindorf et al.2016. Vandalism Detection in Wikidata. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2016, Indianapolis, IN, USA, October 24-28, 2016, Snehasis Mukhopadhyay, ChengXiang Zhai, Elisa Bertino, Fabio Crestani, Javed Mostafa, Jie Tang, Luo Si, Xiaofang Zhou, Yi Chang, Yunyao Li, and Parikshit Sondhi (Eds.). ACM, 327–336.
  11. Thomas Pellissier Tanon et al.2019. Querying the Edit History of Wikidata. In The Semantic Web: ESWC 2019 Satellite Events - ESWC 2019 Satellite Events, Portorož, Slovenia, June 2-6, 2019, Revised Selected Papers(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11762), Pascal Hitzler, Sabrina Kirrane, Olaf Hartig, Victor de Boer, Maria-Esther Vidal, Maria Maleshkova, Stefan Schlobach, Karl Hammar, Nelia Lasierra, Steffen Stadtmüller, Katja Hose, and Ruben Verborgh (Eds.). Springer, 161–166.
  12. Theodoros Rekatsinas et al.2017. SLiMFast: Guaranteed Results for Data Fusion and Source Reliability. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD Conference 2017, Chicago, IL, USA, May 14-19, 2017. ACM, 1399–1414.
  13. Xian Li et al.2012. Truth Finding on the Deep Web: Is the Problem Solved? Proc. VLDB Endow. 6 2 (2012) 97–108. · DOI
  14. Xin Luna Dong et al.2009. Integrating Conflicting Data: The Role of Source Dependence. Proc. VLDB Endow. 2 1 (2009) 550–561. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Xiaoxin Yin et al.2007. Truth discovery with multiple conflicting information providers on the web. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Jose, California, USA, August 12-15, 2007. ACM, 1048–1052.
  16. Zhaochen Su et al.2024. ConflictBank: A Benchmark for Evaluating the Influence of Knowledge Conflicts in LLM. CoRR abs/2408.12076 (2024). arXiv:https://arXiv.org/abs/2408.12076 · arXiv

Metadata

Authors
Jarnac, L., Chabot, Y., & Couceiro, M.
Venue
Proceedings of the Knowledge Capture Conference 2025
Publisher
ACM
Published
2025-12-10
Pages
215-218
Cited by
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WikiConflict: A New Dataset for Conflicting Data Reconciliation in Knowledge Graph Construction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3731443.3771371
The paper
Jarnac, L., Chabot, Y., & Couceiro, M. (2025). WikiConflict: A New Dataset for Conflicting Data Reconciliation in Knowledge Graph Construction. Proceedings of the Knowledge Capture Conference 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3731443.3771371

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.