The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct least-squares fitting of algebraic surfaces
Open accessAbstract
In the course of developing a system for fitting smooth curves to camera input we have developed several direct (i.e. noniterative) methods for fitting a shape (line, circle, conic, cubic, plane, sphere, quadric, etc.) to a set of points, namely exact fit, simple fit, spherical fit, and blend fit. These methods are all dimension-independent, being just as suitable for 3D surfaces as for the 2D curves they were originally developed for.Exact fit generalizes to arbitrary shapes (in the sense of the term defined in this paper) the well-known determinant method for planar exact fit. Simple fit is a naive reduction of the general overconstrained case to the exact case. Spherical fit takes advantage of a special property of circles and spheres that permits robust fitting; no prior direct circle fitters have been as robust, and there have been no previous sphere fitters. Blend fit finds the best fit to a set of points of a useful generalization of Middleditch-Sears blending curves and surfaces, via a nonpolynomial generalization of planar fit.These methods all require (am+bn)n2 operations for fitting a surface of order n to m points, with a = 2 and b = 1/3 typically, except for spherical fit where b is larger due to the need to extract eigenvectors. All these methods save simple fit achieve a robustness previously attained by direct algorithms only for fitting planes. All admit incremental batched addition and deletion of points at cost an2 per point and bn3 per batch.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fitting conic sections to "very scattered" data: An iterative refinement of the bookstein algorithm
Sampson, P. D. (1982) · Computer Graphics and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/0146-664x(82)90101-0 · Cited by 358
Cited by
Surface reconstruction from unorganized points
Hoppe, H., DeRose, T., Duchamp, T., McDonald, J., & Stuetzle, W. (1992) · Proceedings of the 19th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/133994.134011 · Cited by 2,730
A survey on Mesh Segmentation Techniques
Shamir, A. (2008) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007.01103.x · Cited by 593
Alexa, M., Behr, J., Cohen‐Or, D., Fleishman, S., Levin, D., & Silva, C. T. (2001) · IEEE Visualization · doi:10.5555/601671.601673 · Cited by 554
Least Squares Fitting of Circles
Chernov, N., & Lesort, C. (2005) · Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision · doi:10.1007/s10851-005-0482-8 · Cited by 301
Mapping forests using an unmanned ground vehicle with 3D LiDAR and graph-SLAM
Pierzchała, M., Giguère, P., & Astrup, R. (2018) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2017.12.034 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Pratt, V.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1987-08
- Pages
- 145-152
- OpenAlex
- W2119947613
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.35
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct least-squares fitting of algebraic surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/37401.37420
- The paper
- Pratt, V. (1987). Direct least-squares fitting of algebraic surfaces. Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. https://doi.org/10.1145/37401.37420
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.