The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A progressive refinement approach to fast radiosity image generation
Open accessAbstract
A reformulated radiosity algorithm is presented that produces initial images in time linear to the number of patches. The enormous memory costs of the radiosity algorithm are also eliminated by computing form-factors on-the-fly. The technique is based on the approach of rendering by progressive refinement. The algorithm provides a useful solution almost immediately which progresses gracefully and continuously to the complete radiosity solution. In this way the competing demands of realism and interactivity are accommodated. The technique brings the use of radiosity for interactive rendering within reach and has implications for the use and development of current and future graphics workstations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The State of the Art in Interactive Global Illumination
Ritschel, T., Dachsbacher, C., Grosch, T., & Kautz, J. (2012) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2012.02093.x · Cited by 132
Rendering Techniques for Computer-Aided Design
Feldman, S. (1994) · SMPTE Journal · doi:10.5594/j09713 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, M. F., Chen, S. E., Wallace, J. R., & Greenberg, D. P.
- Venue
- ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics
- Published
- 1988-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 75-84
- ISSN
- 0097-8930 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023237845
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
