The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geography-informed energy conservation for Ad Hoc routing
Abstract
We introduce a geographical adaptive fidelity (GAF) algorithm that reduces energy consumption in ad hoc wireless networks. GAF conserves energy by identifying nodes that are equivalent from a routing perspective and then turning off unnecessary nodes, keeping a constant level of routing fidelity. GAF moderates this policy using application- and system-level information; nodes that source or sink data remain on and intermediate nodes monitor and balance energy use. GAF is independent of the underlying ad hoc routing protocol; we simulate GAF over unmodified AODV and DSR. Analysis and simulation studies of GAF show that it can consume 40% to 60% less energy than an unmodified ad hoc routing protocol. Moreover, simulations of GAP suggest that network lifetime increases proportionally to node density; in one example, a four-fold increase in node density leads to network lifetime increase for 3 to 6 times (depending on the mobility pattern). More generally, GAF is an example of adaptive fidelity, a technique proposed for extending the lifetime of self-configuring systems by exploiting redundancy to conserve energy while maintaining application fidelity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system
Bahl, P., & Padmanabhan, V. N. (2002) · Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064) · doi:10.1109/infcom.2000.832252 · Cited by 8,380
Cited by
A survey on clustering algorithms for wireless sensor networks
Abbasi, A. A., & Younis, M. (2007) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2007.05.024 · Cited by 2,383
CODA: congestion detection and avoidance in sensor networks
Wan, C.-Y., Eisenman, S. B., & Campbell, A. T. (2003) · Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems · doi:10.1145/958491.958523 · Cited by 895
Connecting the physical world with pervasive networks
Estrin, D., Culler, D., Pister, K., & Sukhatme, G. (2002) · IEEE Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2002.993145 · Cited by 836
Self-citationIn-network aggregation techniques for wireless sensor networks: a survey
Fasolo, E., Rossi, M., Widmer, J., & Zorzi, M. (2007) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.2007.358967 · Cited by 734
Node clustering in wireless sensor networks: recent developments and deployment challenges
Younis, O., Krunz, M., & Ramasubramanian, S. (2006) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2006.1637928 · Cited by 721
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, Y., Heidemann, J., & Estrin, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2001-07-16
- Pages
- 70-84
- ISSN
- 1543-5679 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965703925
- Cited by
- 2,833
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 48.94
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geography-informed energy conservation for Ad Hoc routing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/381677.381685
- The paper
- Xu, Y., Heidemann, J., & Estrin, D. (2001). Geography-informed energy conservation for Ad Hoc routing. Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. https://doi.org/10.1145/381677.381685
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.