The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Practical forward secure group signature schemes
Abstract
A group signature scheme allows a group member to sign messages anonymously on behalf of the group, while in case of a dispute, a designated entity can reveal the identity of a signature's originator. Group signature schemes can be used as a basic building block for many security applications such as electronic banking systems and electronic voting. Two important issues -- forward security and efficient revocation -- have not been addressed by prior schemes. We construct the first forward-secure group signature schemes. While satisfying all the security properties proposed in previous group signature schemes, our schemes provide a new desired security property, forward-security: while the group public key stays fixed, a group signing key of a group member evolves over time such that compromise of a group signing key of the current time period does not enable an attacker to forge group signatures pertaining to the past time periods. Such forward-security is important to mitigate the damage caused by key exposure and particularly desirable for group signature schemes because the risk of signing key exposure escalates as the size of the group increases. Our schemes are provably secure in the random oracle model and under the strong RSA and decisional Diffie Hellman assumptions.Furthermore, we extend our forward-secure group signature scheme to provide a solution for the problem of group member exclusion without the need to re-key all other group members. When a group member is excluded, he should not be able to generate valid signatures any more and yet his previous signatures remain anonymous. We provide the first solutions which support both retroactive public revocation and backward unlinkability and the signature size is independent of the number of revoked members.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dynamic Accumulators and Application to Efficient Revocation of Anonymous Credentials
Camenisch, J., & Lysyanskaya, A. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45708-9_5 · Cited by 732
Bellare, M., Micciancio, D., & Warinschi, B. (2003) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-39200-9_38 · Cited by 732
Enhanced Privacy ID: A Direct Anonymous Attestation Scheme with Enhanced Revocation Capabilities
Brickell, E., & Li, J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2011.63 · Cited by 91
Secure Audit Logs with Verifiable Excerpts
Hartung, G. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29485-8_11 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, D. X.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Computer and Communications Security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2001-11-05
- Pages
- 225-234
- ISSN
- 1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170017018
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practical forward secure group signature schemes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/501983.502015
- The paper
- Song, D. X. (2001). Practical forward secure group signature schemes. Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Computer and Communications Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/501983.502015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.