The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accountable-subgroup multisignatures: extended abstract
Abstract
Formal models and security proofs are especially important for multisignatures: in contrast to threshold signatures, no precise definitions were ever provided for such schemes, and some proposals were subsequently broken.In this paper, we formalize and implement a variant of multi-signature schemes, Accountable-Subgroup Multisignatures (ASM). In essence, ASM schemes enable any subgroup, S, of a given group, G, of potential signers, to sign efficiently a message M so that the signature provably reveals the identities of the signers in S to any verifier.Specifically, we provide:The first formal model of security for multisignature schemes that explicitly includes key generation (without relying on trusted third parties);A protocol, based on Schnorr's signature scheme [33], that is both provable and efficient:Only three rounds of communication are required per signature.The signing time per signer is the same as for the single-signer Schnorr scheme, regardless of the number of signers.The verification time is only slightly greater than that for the single-signer Schnorr scheme.The signature length is the same as for the single signer Schnorr scheme, regardless of the number of signers.Our proof of security relies on random oracles and the hardness of the Discrete Log Problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Goldreich, O., Micali, S., & Wigderson, A. (1987) · Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM conference on Theory of computing - STOC '87 · doi:10.1145/28395.28420 · Cited by 3,590
Self-citation
Cited by
Provable data possession at untrusted stores
Ateniese, G., Burns, R., Curtmola, R., Herring, J., Kissner, L., Peterson, Z., & Song, D. (2007) · Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1315245.1315318 · Cited by 2,705
Sequential Aggregate Signatures from Trapdoor Permutations
Lysyanskaya, A., Micali, S., Reyzin, L., & Shacham, H. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24676-3_5 · Cited by 311
Self-citationCompact Multi-signatures for Smaller Blockchains
Boneh, D., Drijvers, M., & Neven, G. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03329-3_15 · Cited by 299
Short Threshold Dynamic Group Signatures
Camenisch, J., Drijvers, M., Lehmann, A., Neven, G., & Towa, P. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57990-6_20 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Micali, S., Ohta, K., & Reyzin, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Computer and Communications Security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2001-11-05
- Pages
- 245-254
- ISSN
- 1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134651419
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accountable-subgroup multisignatures: extended abstract. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/501983.502017
- The paper
- Micali, S., Ohta, K., & Reyzin, L. (2001). Accountable-subgroup multisignatures: extended abstract. Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Computer and Communications Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/501983.502017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.