Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,443

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A case for redundant arrays of inexpensive disks (RAID)

Patterson, David A., Gibson, Garth, Katz, Randy H.·1988·Proceedings of the 1988 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '88

Abstract

Increasing performance of CPUs and memories will be squandered if not matched by a similar performance increase in I/O. While the capacity of Single Large Expensive Disks (SLED) has grown rapidly, the performance improvement of SLED has been modest. Redundant Arrays of Inexpensive Disks (RAID), based on the magnetic disk technology developed for personal computers, offers an attractive alternative to SLED, promising improvements of an order of magnitude in performance, reliability, power consumption, and scalability. This paper introduces five levels of RAIDs, giving their relative cost/performance, and compares RAID to an IBM 3380 and a Fujitsu Super Eagle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/50202.50214

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,443

Metadata

Authors
Patterson, D. A., Gibson, G., & Katz, R. H.
Venue
Proceedings of the 1988 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '88
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
1988
Pages
109-116
ISSN
0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4248578633
Cited by
1,443
References
0
FWCI
17.88
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A case for redundant arrays of inexpensive disks (RAID). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/50202.50214
The paper
Patterson, D. A., Gibson, G., & Katz, R. H. (1988). A case for redundant arrays of inexpensive disks (RAID). Proceedings of the 1988 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '88. https://doi.org/10.1145/50202.50214

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.