The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mining top-n local outliers in large databases
Abstract
Outlier detection is an important task in data mining with numerous applications, including credit card fraud detection, video surveillance, etc. A recent work on outlier detection has introduced a novel notion of local outlier in which the degree to which an object is outlying is dependent on the density of its local neighborhood, and each object can be assigned a Local Outlier Factor (LOF) which represents the likelihood of that object being an outlier. Although the concept of local outliers is a useful one, the computation of LOF values for every data objects requires a large number of κ-nearest neighbors searches and can be computationally expensive. Since most objects are usually not outliers, it is useful to provide users with the option of finding only n most outstanding local outliers, i.e., the top-n data objects which are most likely to be local outliers according to their LOFs. However, if the pruning is not done carefully, finding top-n outliers could result in the same amount of computation as finding LOF for all objects. In this paper, we propose a novel method to efficiently find the top-n local outliers in large databases. The concept of "micro-cluster" is introduced to compress the data. An efficient micro-cluster-based local outlier mining algorithm is designed based on this concept. As our algorithm can be adversely affected by the overlapping in the micro-clusters, we proposed a meaningful cut-plane solution for overlapping data. The formal analysis and experiments show that this method can achieve good performance in finding the most outstanding local outliers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LOF: identifying density-based local outliers
Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H.-P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2000) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/335191.335388 · Cited by 5,207
LOF: identifying density-based local outliers
Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H.-P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2000) · Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/342009.335388 · Cited by 4,149
Hawkins, D. M. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-3994-4 · Cited by 2,982
Cited by
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Hierarchical Density Estimates for Data Clustering, Visualization, and Outlier Detection
Campello, R. J. G. B., Moulavi, D., Zimek, A., & Sander, J. (2015) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/2733381 · Cited by 915
A survey on unsupervised outlier detection in high‐dimensional numerical data
Zimek, A., Schubert, E., & Kriegel, H. (2012) · Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal · doi:10.1002/sam.11161 · Cited by 864
Outlier mining in large high-dimensional data sets
Angiulli, F., & Pizzuti, C. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2005.31 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Jin, W., Tung, A. K. H., & Han, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2001-08-26
- Pages
- 293-298
- OpenAlex
- W2050439513
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mining top-n local outliers in large databases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/502512.502554
- The paper
- Jin, W., Tung, A. K. H., & Han, J. (2001). Mining top-n local outliers in large databases. Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/502512.502554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.