The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Query clustering using user logs
Abstract
Query clustering is a process used to discover frequently asked questions or most popular topics on a search engine. This process is crucial for search engines based on question-answering. Because of the short lengths of queries, approaches based on keywords are not suitable for query clustering. This paper describes a new query clustering method that makes use of user logs which allow us to identify the documents the users have selected for a query. The similarity between two queries may be deduced from the common documents the users selected for them. Our experiments show that a combination of both keywords and user logs is better than using either method alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ST-DBSCAN: An algorithm for clustering spatial–temporal data
Birant, D., & Kut, A. (2007) · Data & Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.datak.2006.01.013 · Cited by 1,430
Query expansion techniques for information retrieval: a survey
Azad, H. K., & Deepak, A. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.05.009 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Information Systems
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-81
- ISSN
- 1046-8188 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2868
- OpenAlex
- W2041179002
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 56.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Query clustering using user logs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/503104.503108
- The paper
- Query clustering using user logs. (2002). ACM Transactions on Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/503104.503108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
