The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An optimal minimum spanning tree algorithm
Abstract
We establish that the algorithmic complexity of the minimum spanning tree problem is equal to its decision-tree complexity. Specifically, we present a deterministic algorithm to find a minimum spanning tree of a graph with n vertices and m edges that runs in time O ( T * ( m,n )) where T * is the minimum number of edge-weight comparisons needed to determine the solution. The algorithm is quite simple and can be implemented on a pointer machine.Although our time bound is optimal, the exact function describing it is not known at present. The current best bounds known for T * are T * ( m,n ) = Ω( m ) and T * ( m,n ) = O ( m ∙ α( m,n )), where α is a certain natural inverse of Ackermann's function.Even under the assumption that T * is superlinear, we show that if the input graph is selected from G n,m , our algorithm runs in linear time with high probability, regardless of n , m , or the permutation of edge weights. The analysis uses a new martingale for G n,m similar to the edge-exposure martingale for G n,p .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1205
(1999) · Industrial Robot: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/ir.1999.04926fae.001 · Cited by 38,662
A note on two problems in connexion with graphs
Dijkstra, E. W. (1959) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf01386390 · Cited by 24,043
The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms
Aho, A. V., & Hopcroft, J. E. (1974) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 9,403
The Evolution of Random Graphs
(1986) · CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics · doi:10.1090/cbms/062/06 · Cited by 5,543
Shortest Connection Networks And Some Generalizations
Prim, R. C. (1957) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1957.tb01515.x · Cited by 4,565
Spencer, J. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,310
Fibonacci heaps and their uses in improved network optimization algorithms
Fredman, M. L., & Tarjan, R. E. (1987) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/28869.28874 · Cited by 2,656
On the History of the Minimum Spanning Tree Problem
Graham, R. L., & Hell, P. (1985) · IEEE Annals of the History of Computing · doi:10.1109/mahc.1985.10011 · Cited by 813
Efficient algorithms for finding minimum spanning trees in undirected and directed graphs
Gabow, H. N., Galil, Z., Spencer, T., & Tarjan, R. E. (1986) · Combinatorica · doi:10.1007/bf02579168 · Cited by 517
Trans-dichotomous algorithms for minimum spanning trees and shortest paths
Fredman, M. L., & Willard, D. E. (1994) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0022-0000(05)80064-9 · Cited by 419
Cited by
Extracting a cellular hierarchy from high-dimensional cytometry data with SPADE
Qiu, P., Simonds, E. F., Bendall, S. C., Gibbs, K. D., Bruggner, R. V., Linderman, M. D., Sachs, K., Nolan, G. P., & Plevritis, S. K. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1991 · Cited by 956
Metadata
- Authors
- Pettie, S., & Ramachandran, V.
- Venue
- Journal of the ACM
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-34
- ISSN
- 0004-5411 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-735X
- OpenAlex
- W1965525854
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 8.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An optimal minimum spanning tree algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/505241.505243
- The paper
- Pettie, S., & Ramachandran, V. (2002). An optimal minimum spanning tree algorithm. Journal of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/505241.505243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.