Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Near-optimal sparse fourier representations via sampling

Gilbert, A. C., Guha, S., Indyk, P., Muthukrishnan, S., Strauss, M.·2002·Proceedings of the thiry-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing

Abstract

(MATH) We give an algorithm for finding a Fourier representation R of B terms for a given discrete signal signal A of length N, such that $\|\signal-\repn\|_2^2$ is within the factor (1 +ε) of best possible $\|\signal-\repn_\opt\|_2^2$. Our algorithm can access A by reading its values on a sample set T ⊆[0,N), chosen randomly from a (non-product) distribution of our choice, independent of A. That is, we sample non-adaptively. The total time cost of the algorithm is polynomial in B log(N)log(M)ε (where M is the ratio of largest to smallest numerical quantity encountered), which implies a similar bound for the number of samples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/509907.509933

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Gilbert, A. C., Guha, S., Indyk, P., Muthukrishnan, S., & Strauss, M.
Venue
Proceedings of the thiry-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Publisher
ACM
Published
2002-05-19
Pages
152-161
OpenAlex
W2012365979
Cited by
259
References
0
FWCI
8.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Near-optimal sparse fourier representations via sampling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/509907.509933
The paper
Gilbert, A. C., Guha, S., Indyk, P., Muthukrishnan, S., & Strauss, M. (2002). Near-optimal sparse fourier representations via sampling. Proceedings of the thiry-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing. https://doi.org/10.1145/509907.509933

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.