The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Similarity estimation techniques from rounding algorithms
Abstract
A locality sensitive hashing scheme is a distribution on a family F of hash functions operating on a collection of objects, such that for two objects x, y, Prh∈F[h(x) = h(y)] = sim(x,y), where sim(x,y) ∈ [0, 1] is some similarity function defined on the collection of objects. Such a scheme leads to a compact representation of objects so that similarity of objects can be estimated from their compact sketches, and also leads to efficient algorithms for approximate nearest neighbor search and clustering. Min-wise independent permutations provide an elegant construction of such a locality sensitive hashing scheme for a collection of subsets with the set similarity measure sim(A, B) = |A∩B| |A∪B |. We show that rounding algorithms for LPs and SDPs used in the context of approximation algorithms can be viewed as locality sensitive hashing schemes for several interesting collections of objects. Based on this insight, we construct new locality sensitive hashing schemes for: 1. A collection of vectors with the distance between ⃗u and ⃗v measured by θ(⃗u,⃗v)/π, where θ(⃗u,⃗v) is the angle between ⃗u and ⃗v. This yields a sketching scheme for estimating the cosine similarity measure between two vectors, as well as a simple alternative to minwise independent permutations for estimating set similarity. 2. A collection of distributions on n points in a metric space, with distance between distributions measured by the Earth Mover Distance (EMD), (a popular distance measure in graphics and vision). Our hash functions map distributions to points in the metric space such that, for distributions P and Q,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Approximate nearest neighbors: towards removing the curse of dimensionality
Indyk, P., & Motwani, R. (1998) · Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '98 · doi:10.1145/276698.276876 · Cited by 4,188
Goemans, M. X., & Williamson, D. P. (1995) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/227683.227684 · Cited by 3,587
Cited by
Near-optimal hashing algorithms for approximate nearest neighbor in high dimensions
Andoni, A., & Indyk, P. (2008) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1327452.1327494 · Cited by 1,437
Efficient integration of heterogeneous single-cell transcriptomes using Scanorama
Hie, B., Bryson, B., & Berger, B. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0113-3 · Cited by 974
FastText.zip: Compressing text classification models
Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., Douze, M., Jégou, H., & Mikolov, T. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.03651 · Cited by 887
Detecting near-duplicates for web crawling
Manku, G. S., Jain, A., & Das Sarma, A. (2007) · Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/1242572.1242592 · Cited by 617
Exploration in deep reinforcement learning: A survey
Ladosz, P., Weng, L., Kim, M., & Oh, H. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.03.003 · Cited by 525
“Here, a technique called SimHash [63] was used, which rep-”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Charikar, M. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the thiry-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2002-05-19
- Pages
- 380-388
- OpenAlex
- W2012833704
- Cited by
- 2,220
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.82
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Similarity estimation techniques from rounding algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/509907.509965
- The paper
- Charikar, M. S. (2002). Similarity estimation techniques from rounding algorithms. Proceedings of the thiry-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing. https://doi.org/10.1145/509907.509965
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.