The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Topic-sensitive PageRank
Abstract
In the original PageRank algorithm for improving the ranking of search-query results, a single PageRank vector is computed, using the link structure of the Web, to capture the relative "importance" of Web pages, independent of any particular search query. To yield more accurate search results, we propose computing a set of PageRank vectors, biased using a set of representative topics, to capture more accurately the notion of importance with respect to a particular topic. By using these (precomputed) biased PageRank vectors to generate query-specific importance scores for pages at query time, we show that we can generate more accurate rankings than with a single, generic PageRank vector. For ordinary keyword search queries, we compute the topic-sensitive PageRank scores for pages satisfying the query using the topic of the query keywords. For searches done in context (e.g., when the search query is performed by highlighting words in a Web page), we compute the topic-sensitive PageRank scores using the topic of the context in which the query appeared.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Open Domain Question Answering Using Early Fusion of Knowledge Bases and Text
Sun, H., Dhingra, B., Zaheer, M., Mazaitis, K., Salakhutdinov, R., & Cohen, W. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1455 · Cited by 466
LifeLogging: Personal Big Data
Gurrin, C., Smeaton, A. F., & Doherty, A. R. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000033 · Cited by 434
Abstractive Document Summarization with a Graph-Based Attentional Neural Model
Tan, J., Wan, X., & Xiao, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1108 · Cited by 325
Embeddings for Word Sense Disambiguation: An Evaluation Study
Iacobacci, I., Pilehvar, M. T., & Navigli, R. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1085 · Cited by 253
ProjE: Embedding Projection for Knowledge Graph Completion
Shi, B., & Weninger, T. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10677 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Haveliwala, T. H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on World Wide Web - WWW '02
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2002
- OpenAlex
- W4233775226
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topic-sensitive PageRank. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/511511.511513
- The paper
- Haveliwala, T. H. (2002). Topic-sensitive PageRank. Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on World Wide Web - WWW '02. https://doi.org/10.1145/511511.511513
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.