The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance analysis of the CONFIDANT protocol
Open accessAbstract
Mobile ad-hoc networking works properly only if the participating nodes cooperate in routing and forwarding. However,it may be advantageous for individual nodes not to cooperate. We propose a protocol, called CONFIDANT, for making misbehavior unattractive; it is based on selective altruism and utilitarianism. It aims at detecting and isolating misbehaving nodes, thus making it unattractive to deny cooperation. Trust relationships and routing decisions are based on experienced, observed, or reported routing and forwarding behavior of other nodes. The detailed implementation of CONFIDANT in this paper assumes that the network layer is based on the Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) protocol. We present a performance analysis of DSR fortified by CONFIDANT and compare it to regular defenseless DSR. It shows that a network with CONFIDANT and up to 60% of misbehaving nodes behaves almost as well as a benign network, in sharp contrast to a defenseless network. All simulations have been implemented and performed in GloMoSim.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Resnick, P., Kuwabara, K., Zeckhauser, R., & Friedman, E. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/355112.355122 · Cited by 2,190
Cited by
A Survey of Intrusion Detection Systems in Wireless Sensor Networks
Butun, I., Morgera, S. D., & Sankar, R. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.050113.00191 · Cited by 833
A survey of intrusion detection techniques for cyber-physical systems
Mitchell, R., & Chen, I.-R. (2014) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2542049 · Cited by 768
IoT Elements, Layered Architectures and Security Issues: A Comprehensive Survey
Burhan, M., Rehman, R. A., Khan, B., & Kim, B.-S. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18092796 · Cited by 518
Luong, N. C., Hoang, D. T., Wang, P., Niyato, D., Kim, D. I., & Han, Z. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2582841 · Cited by 357
Vehicular networks and the future of the mobile internet
Gerla, M., & Kleinrock, L. (2011) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2010.10.015 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Buchegger, S., & Le Boudec, J.-Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2002-06-09
- Pages
- 226-236
- OpenAlex
- W2115373791
- Cited by
- 1,495
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.47
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance analysis of the CONFIDANT protocol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/513800.513828
- The paper
- Buchegger, S., & Le Boudec, J.-Y. (2002). Performance analysis of the CONFIDANT protocol. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing. https://doi.org/10.1145/513800.513828
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
